[sympy] Re: GSoC 2017 Application : Implementation of multiple types of coordinate systems for vectors

I have also submitted a draft of my proposal : GSoC 2017 Application : Multiple Coordinate Systems Please review the draft and give me your valuable suggestions On Friday, March 31, 2017 at 3:18:1

Re: [sympy] GSOC 2016: Assumptions

"but there is still plenty of work to do" Can you please elaborate on what work is left to be done? I'd really like to implement changes in Assumption module. On Saturday, 13 February 2016 00:09:22 UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > The ideas page on assumptions needs to be updated. There was a

[sympy] GSoC 2017 Proposal: Sympy Online compiler

Hi everyone! I am Barry Franklin , an undergraduate Engineering student. I will like to propose working on an online compiler and possible debugger of "sympy code". I wish ask there has been any previous work that has been done related to that. Regards Barry -- You receiv

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2017 Proposal: Sympy Online compiler

Can you clarify what you mean by an online compiler? Aaron Meurer On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 2:04 PM, tamanji barry wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I am Barry Franklin , an undergraduate Engineering student. I will like to > propose working on an online compiler and possible debugger of "sympy code". >

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2017 Proposal: Sympy Online compiler

I see it a means of permitting the user to upload his code to a possible website, the code is checked and and he/she is informed of the possible bugs especially with respect to syntax. On Friday, March 31, 2017 at 7:06:18 PM UTC+1, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > Can you clarify what you mean by an o

[sympy] GSoC 2017 : Proposal

Hello everyone, I have written my proposal by gathering ideas from Sympy Ideas list and code generation notes. Please review it and suggest changes and improvement needs to be done. Here is the link https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/CodeGeneration-Enhancement Thanks for you

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2017 : Proposal

Can you please use the standard title format for your proposal on the Wiki? I think the project should do more than add Javascript and Lisp support. The code printers already support Javascript, and I don't think Lisp support would need to be more than a single pull request, especially since Lisp

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC Idea: Rubi integrator

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:25 AM, Abdullah Javed Nesar wrote: > Hi Ondrej, > > Yah exactly, for the first part of the project we'll possibly rewrite the > matcher somewhat similar to as explained in #7748. But, I think we have to > keep on working on it and modifying it as we move on with the secon

[sympy] Re: GSOC 2017: SymPy Live and SymPy Gamma (on Google App Engine)

Hi David, My GSOC proposal : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v0N6Fe84Yfo_h5Pip38N9LCAkyXBJP4-6XVYPzjBlrs/edit?usp=sharing Any suggestion regarding to this project that's really helps me. Thanks, Bhautik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy"

[sympy] GSOC Proposal : Singularity Functions

Hello Everyone, I would like to have a deeper discussion reg. the idea of Singularity functions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+u

[sympy] Re: GSOC 2017: SymPy Live and SymPy Gamma (on Google App Engine)

Hi Bhautik, Quick thoughts: NLP: How will your tagger, stemmer, and lemmatizer deal with mathematical input? Is there any guarantee they won't trip over or mangle math expressions? Will the lemmatizer deal with things like oo, inf, infinity, unicode symbols, etc? I'm also not sure how regexes

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2017 : Proposal

How about if I add Rust and LLVM ,numba will that be okay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, sen

[sympy] GSoC : Singularity Function

Hello, I would like to know reg. Singularity Function idea as there is already a package in function.special. So I am in confusion regarding what is needed to be done. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2017 : Proposal

How about if I add llvmjit inside codegen and rust inside printing as well as codegen.py -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups

Re: [sympy] GSoC : Singularity Function

I recommend trying to solve beam bending or other problems that utilize singularity functions with the current module. You will quickly find many deficiencies and ideas for new features. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 2:16 PM, satya prakash wrote: > Hello, >

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2017 : Proposal

All of those are already present in the codebase or a pull request. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 2:28 PM, satya prakash wrote: > How about if I add llvmjit inside codegen and rust inside printing as well > as codegen.py > > -- > You received this message becau

[sympy] GSoC : Parsing

Hi, I would like to work on Parsing as my project. So I would like to know latest updates on the topic -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubs

[sympy] Re: GSoC : Parsing

Regarding parsing Python expression to Sympy expression, I think sympy_parser does that. On Saturday, April 1, 2017 at 9:35:02 AM UTC+5:30, satya prakash wrote: > > Hi, >I would like to work on Parsing as my project. So I would like to know > latest updates on the topic > -- You received

Re: [sympy] Improving codegen(and related stuff)

Last night, I tried to find a workaround but was unable to do so. The problem lies in the CIM which does not account for non-commutativity. I think a good starting point could be having two forms of the CIM : A commutative form and a non-commutative one. For example, If a, b are two non-commutat