[sympy] Introduction

Level of familiarity with python: Proficient Mathematical Education Level: Undergrad Particular Expertise: Mechanics Particular Algorithmic interests: Solving Mathematics and Mechanics Problems. Level Of familiarity with Symbolic mathematics: Skilled Familiarity with Sympy: Moderate Other Po

[sympy] GSoC Ideas to work on ODE module

Hi, I was planning to work on ODE module in my GSoC project so I started working on my proposal for refactoring the ODE module. But, I did not realise until yesterday that Mohit Balwani is also

Re: [sympy] Re: Useful GSoC Idea

Note that the deadline for an application is tomorrow. If you want us to provide feedback so that you can improve it, please post a draft as soon as you can. Ondrej On Sun, Mar 29, 2020, at 5:02 PM, Jackson Morris wrote: > Ah alright, I am relived to hear that - I started taking a look at some

Re: [sympy] Re: Vector Integration Proposal for GSoC feedback

I would suggest calculating for a geometric simplex https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplex since simplexes are the building blocks for finite element method calculations.  I think one of the main applications of your package could be for calculating the boundary element method equations for va

Re: [sympy] Re: Vector Integration Proposal for GSoC feedback

Thank you for your suggestions, Alan. For the GSoC, I will try implementing all the functionality for 3D as the vector package now only supports 3D. I will define a class for the tetrahedron. Unfortunately, I am not very familiar with BEM equations but I am looking into them. Thanks Faisal Riyaz

Re: [sympy] Re: Useful GSoC Idea

Ah, I posted the link in the Gitter chat last night, but should have also poster here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cYyk2beU8d4XLtBV_Z-j7XLUpF4JOgROv1mHEcB1_rc/edit?usp=sharing any feedback would be greatly appreciated! On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 7:34:51 AM UTC-7, ondrej wrote: > > N

Re: [sympy] Re: Useful GSoC Idea

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020, at 10:29 AM, Jackson Morris wrote: > Ah, I posted the link in the Gitter chat last night, but should have > also poster here: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cYyk2beU8d4XLtBV_Z-j7XLUpF4JOgROv1mHEcB1_rc/edit?usp=sharing > any feedback would be greatly appreciated!

Re: [sympy] Re: Useful GSoC Idea

Got it, I will add more detail for manualintegrate, rework my timeline, and finish that PR. Best, Jackson On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 9:40 AM Ondřej Čertík wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020, at 10:29 AM, Jackson Morris wrote: > > Ah, I posted the link in the Gitter chat last night, but should have

Re: [sympy] GSoC ideas regarding SymPy / Fortran integration

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020, at 6:46 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 4:58 PM Ondřej Čertík wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020, at 4:47 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 4:19 PM Ondřej Čertík wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I am looking for stu

[sympy] Requesting Review from Sympy

Hey everyone, Mohit here I have prepared the proposal for *group theory* and I request everyone to please review it and give general advice I will be really glad to hear that since tommorow is the last date so I expect your reply :) link to my proposal : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qFXj

Re: [sympy] Re: [Discussion] [GSoC] Creating a Java Parser

Thanks Gajjar. I agree with Nikhil and overall this looks good. Ondrej On Sun, Mar 29, 2020, at 4:17 PM, Gajjar Smit wrote: > I have updated the proposal > > according to the latest suggestions. Please review the

Re: [sympy] GSoC Ideas to work on ODE module

Hi Bhaskar, It is fine for multiple applicants to suggest similar projects. There are plenty of other things to do in terms of refactoring and optimising that will become possible as the initial refactoring becomes complete. For example we should add benchmarks to the benchmarks repo and profile a

[sympy] Introduction

Just introducing myself, as I'm hoping to make some contributions soon. I'm a postdoctoral fellow in quantum-information theory: http://www.unm.edu/~jagross. I'm fairly familiar with python, having used it on an almost-daily basis for my research since during my PhD (probably started heavy use

Re: [sympy] Re: [Discussion] [GSoC] Creating a Java Parser

Thank you for the review, Sir! I will be uploading pdf of this final version! Also, I got a workaround for parsing binary operators in Clang(using tokens). I will make a PR soon. Thanks On Mon 30 Mar, 2020, 10:34 PM Ondřej Čertík, wrote: > Thanks Gajjar. I agree with Nikhil and overall this l

[sympy] Re: Gsoc 2020 : Application review for series expansion

Below is the link to my proposal. It would be helpful if the mentors could review it https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HmI-3vhZmj5VylzmtNRTxq0VxWX3lEfF6L_drmkQCtI/edit?usp=sharing On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 10:24:15 AM UTC+5:30, Saanidhya Vats wrote: > > I have attached the proposal below.

[sympy] Re: Extending the categories module

Hey everyone, I know that all the mentors must be really busy with the proposals right now. But I request you to take a look at mine too. My proposal is completely raw (as in it hasn't been reviewed at all yet). I'd be extremely grateful if you could do the needful. https://docs.google.com/documen

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2020 proposal Improving Assumptions Mo

Hi. In the future, please send a link to the proposal on the wiki or a Google Docs. It is hard to read the full proposal in an email. Here are my comments on the proposal. Most of the inconsistencies in the assumptions have already been fixed, as there was a pretty large cleanup of the infinitie

Re: [sympy] GSoC Ideas to work on ODE module

Thank you for these ideas. I will definitely look into this and get back to you soon. On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 11:39:02 PM UTC+5:30, Oscar wrote: > > Hi Bhaskar, > > It is fine for multiple applicants to suggest similar projects. There > are plenty of other things to do in terms of refacto

Re: [sympy] Proposal draft - Probabilities project

Τη Κυριακή, 29 Μαρτίου 2020 - 9:22:19 μ.μ. UTC+3, ο χρήστης czgdp1807 έγραψε: Hi and once again thank you very much for your comments! Thanks for pointing out. This is because the Markov Chain in the example is > reducible and therefore it doesn't have a unique solution to sP = s. Have > you

[sympy] Re: Gsoc 2020 : Implementing better integer factorization algorithms

I have submitted my proposal, but since the deadline is tomorrow and google allows edition the proposal, so i humbly request the mentors to please review my proposal and if there are any improvements that might be needed please let me know. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1y_kLou7NwodV75puX88

Re: [sympy] Re: Vector Integration Proposal for GSoC feedback

Hello all, If possible, please provide your feedback on this approach. Thanks Faisal Riyaz On Mon 30 Mar, 2020, 10:24 AM Faisal Riyaz, wrote: > I am looking at the Maple functionalities for vector Integration. I think > Maple has the best functionality for vector integration among other CAS. >