Hi Abhishek,
I went over all the ideas and they look well researched to me. Personally,
I would prefer if the idea -
"Add a symbolic solver (and a numeric solver if required) with the help of
the existing ODE module to solve x' = Ax + Bu form that to *return the
symbolic evaluation of the syste
Sorry I pressed post message by mistake. Continuing the reply here -
Hi Abhishek,
I went over all the ideas and they look well researched to me. Personally,
I would prefer if the idea -
"Add a symbolic solver (and a numeric solver if required) with the help of
the existing ODE module to solve
Greetings,
I was looking at the integral and differential functions of the SumPy
libraries, and wondered if adding this feature would be useful or not. I
was thinking maybe we can add a feature into this library which allows
users to go through the steps of these complex calculations in brief.
I'm facing a similar issue. I think SymPy is not treating correctly the sum
of (co)vectors.
In this question I exemplify my issue
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/78226587/sympy-manipulation-of-wedge-products
Could anyone shed a light on how to properly sum differential forms?
Thanks in advanc
In https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/26399 there is proposal to allow
`subs` to recognize `Eq` so ` x.subs(x, 1) = x.subs( Eq(x, 1) ) = x.subs( [
Eq(x, 1) ] ) = 1` but `x.subs(Eq(1, x)) = x`.
It would be good to see if there is any strong senitment and rationale for
or against this.
In favor
