Re: [sympy] ODE Refactoring

2021-03-17 Thread Marco Antônio Habitzreuter
ns made in the original PR about the exception and the use of simplify(). Best regards, Marco. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubs

Re: [sympy] ODE Refactoring

2021-03-16 Thread Marco Antônio Habitzreuter
Oscar, > When continuing an existing PR by another author it is important to > keep the note of who wrote what intact in the git commits. I would > checkout the branch of the other contributor and rebase it to master > and then add my own commits on top. I was able to rebase and get that code wor

[sympy] ODE Refactoring

2021-03-16 Thread Marco Antônio Habitzreuter
b.com/sympy/sympy/issues/18348. There is a PR refactoring the code for exact ODEs which seems abandoned at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/18887. Would it be okay if I tried to finish it? Marco. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy&

Re: [sympy] simple question

2016-10-21 Thread Marco Inacio
ll could end up > corresponding to something trivial). You'd need to profile the > functions to see the difference. LIkely one is taking a slightly > different code path than the other. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Marco Inacio > wrote:

[sympy] simple question

2016-10-21 Thread Marco Inacio
Hi, out of curiosity I wanted to know why does this: from sympy.solvers import solve from sympy import Symbol,exp x=Symbol("x") solve(x*10e-4+exp(x),x) runs much faster than this: from sympy.solvers import solve from sympy import Symbol,exp x=Symbol("x") solve(x+exp(x/10e-4),x) (?) Thanks! -

[sympy] Re: General questions about the structure of SymPy

2009-08-01 Thread Marco
Hi Aaron, Can you explain the thinking behind the Symbol class? I looked at the doc string but it's not clear how general this kind of object is. Thanks On Jul 31, 11:16 pm, "Aaron S. Meurer" wrote: > On Jul 31, 2009, at 8:42 PM, Marco wrote: > > > > >

[sympy] Re: General questions about the structure of SymPy

2009-07-31 Thread Marco
Hi Aaron, The Set class is important to have as a master class for all kinds of other classes which should exist, such as Group, Field, Vector space, Algebra, etc. As it is in Category theory. A Python set may indeed be a good place to start, but as you suggest, it would only be a finite set of

[sympy] Re: General questions about the structure of SymPy

2009-07-31 Thread Marco
what we do every day in what I would consider is the most mainstream mathematics. Let me know what you think. Marco On Jul 30, 9:02 am, Ondrej Certik wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Aaron S. Meurer wrote: > > > Hi.  Ondrej will probably have better an

[sympy] Re: General questions about the structure of SymPy

2009-07-31 Thread Marco
Thank you for this - I am studying it and it definitely has some of the flavour of what i'm thinking of. Once I understand it better I can say more. On Jul 30, 10:47 am, Alan Bromborsky wrote: > Marco wrote: > > I was very impressed by the description of SymPy h

[sympy] General questions about the structure of SymPy

2009-07-29 Thread Marco
I was very impressed by the description of SymPy here: http://www.euroscipy.org/presentations/slides/index.html and especially slide 14 "Internals: Object oriented model". I have a couple of general questions about how Object-oriented SymPy is. I'm a mathematician and would like to use or exten