>> Does it make sense to move Commutator (currently defined in
>> sympy/physics/secondquant) to a bit more general place (like
>> sympy/physics)?
>>
>> And is current implementation also good enough for adding it an
>> alternative LieBracket name?
The existing Commutator class in secondquant is be
Hi Priit,
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Priit Laes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does it make sense to move Commutator (currently defined in
> sympy/physics/secondquant) to a bit more general place (like
> sympy/physics)?
>
> And is current implementation also good enough for adding it an
> alternative Lie
Hi,
Does it make sense to move Commutator (currently defined in
sympy/physics/secondquant) to a bit more general place (like
sympy/physics)?
And is current implementation also good enough for adding it an
alternative LieBracket name?
Cheers,
Priit ;)
--
You received this message because you ar