Re: [sympy] Commutator as general function?

2010-10-12 Thread Brian Granger
>> Does it make sense to move Commutator (currently defined in >> sympy/physics/secondquant) to a bit more general place (like >> sympy/physics)? >> >> And is current implementation also good enough for adding it an >> alternative LieBracket name? The existing Commutator class in secondquant is be

Re: [sympy] Commutator as general function?

2010-09-30 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Priit, On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Priit Laes wrote: > Hi, > > Does it make sense to move Commutator (currently defined in > sympy/physics/secondquant) to a bit more general place (like > sympy/physics)? > > And is current implementation also good enough for adding it an > alternative Lie

[sympy] Commutator as general function?

2010-09-29 Thread Priit Laes
Hi, Does it make sense to move Commutator (currently defined in sympy/physics/secondquant) to a bit more general place (like sympy/physics)? And is current implementation also good enough for adding it an alternative LieBracket name? Cheers, Priit ;) -- You received this message because you ar