Hi,
I have been working on the dense matrix for the last few days. The PR is [1]
I have written some Profile results in [2]. Here I draw some conclusions.
There is an absolute need of a more efficient data structure to store and
use dense matrices. The current implementation with all of the
_
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Saurabh Jha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been working on the dense matrix for the last few days. The PR is
> [1]
>
> I have written some Profile results in [2]. Here I draw some conclusions.
>
I would try profiling much larger matrices, so that you can see what is
slow
2013/7/6 Saurabh Jha
Hi,
>
> I have been working on the dense matrix for the last few days. The PR is
> [1]
>
> I have written some Profile results in [2]. Here I draw some conclusions.
>
Sorry, but your profiling is totally useless. You need to profile something
that lasts for a little more tha
I have posted some new profiles in [1]. Please have a look.
[1]
http://sympymatrix.blogspot.in/2013/07/some-improved-profiles-of-dense-matrix.html
On Sunday, July 7, 2013 5:15:48 AM UTC+5:30, Ronan Lamy wrote:
>
> 2013/7/6 Saurabh Jha >
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I have been working on the dense matrix for
I have just rewritten and add a few functions for row operations in my
current PR. The diff looks quite messy just have a look at [1]. This is
rewritten although it is largely the same.
Here is the summary of profile results. I am now using gmpy ground types.
>>> for i in range(1000, 3000):
