Hi everyone,
it's been a long time, I was following the project but didn't have
time to contribute.
2008/11/16 Riccardo Gori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Sunday 16 November 2008 15:02:44 Kirill Smelkov wrote:
[...]
>> Guys, even if you prefer BSD, or LGPL or whatever, please state it
>> clearly, w
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Kirill Smelkov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And also I say again that almost every program actually *uses* LGPL'ed
> libraries: for example glibc:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /usr/bin/python
>linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7f32000)
>libpthread.so.0 => /lib
Brian,
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 10:14:39AM -0800, Brian Granger wrote:
>
> > Brian email: do you mean that it is difficult to understand legal
> > wording? Hm, yes, legal texts are difficult, but LGPL is with us for
> > ~ 15 years already, and I personally always thought that there is a
> > clear
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:57:29PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> Hi Kirr,
>
> >> Well, read this post:
> >>
> >> http://www.miriamruiz.es/weblog/?p=192
> >>
> >> so the answer is yes and no. Which means AGPL is on the edge between
> >> free and non-free, as viewed by many people around Debian.
> Brian email: do you mean that it is difficult to understand legal
> wording? Hm, yes, legal texts are difficult, but LGPL is with us for
> ~ 15 years already, and I personally always thought that there is a
> clear traction of it, e.g. as written here:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Lesser
Hi Kirr,
>> Well, read this post:
>>
>> http://www.miriamruiz.es/weblog/?p=192
>>
>> so the answer is yes and no. Which means AGPL is on the edge between
>> free and non-free, as viewed by many people around Debian.
>> I definitely want sympy to be on the safe side of the edge.
>
> So you say we
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 04:05:07PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> Hi Kirr,
>
> well, today is a licensing weekend. I wanted to release today, but
> let's get this discussed, I think it is important. It'd have to be
> discussed anyway sooner or later.
I too needed to work on video encoding issu
Hi Kirr,
well, today is a licensing weekend. I wanted to release today, but
let's get this discussed, I think it is important. It'd have to be
discussed anyway sooner or later.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Kirill Smelkov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 01:36:30PM +0100
On Sunday 16 November 2008 15:02:44 Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 01:36:30PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> > Hi Kirr,
> >
> > let me say that I am not convinced that LGPL is better for SymPy.
> >
> > It seems to me that you think that LGPL will protect you 100% and keep
> >
> > y
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 01:36:30PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> Hi Kirr,
>
> let me say that I am not convinced that LGPL is better for SymPy.
>
> It seems to me that you think that LGPL will protect you 100% and keep
> you happy:
>
> > Initially I was in a shape and could afford myself wor
I didn't finish some things:
>> Actually some people we all know want money first [1], or stop working
>> on their "babies" after their grant is finished [2], or want to be paid
>> working for companies which want to keep their modifications secret [3],
>
> So what? I know all those people person
Hi Kirr,
let me say that I am not convinced that LGPL is better for SymPy.
It seems to me that you think that LGPL will protect you 100% and keep
you happy:
> Initially I was in a shape and could afford myself working on sympy
> without protection, but when it started to be very tough, I have t
12 matches
Mail list logo
