Great to hear.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Federico Vaggi
wrote:
> Hey - I'm working on a PR now. I'll write up some tests too.
>
> Fede
>
> On Friday, 25 October 2013 10:07:46 UTC+2, Øyvind Jensen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, October 24, 2013 4:48:36 PM UTC+2, Federico Vag
Hey - I'm working on a PR now. I'll write up some tests too.
Fede
On Friday, 25 October 2013 10:07:46 UTC+2, Øyvind Jensen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, October 24, 2013 4:48:36 PM UTC+2, Federico Vaggi wrote:
>>
>> Got it. Thanks for the suggestion.
>>
>
> Great! How did you fix it? Would you mi
On Thursday, October 24, 2013 4:48:36 PM UTC+2, Federico Vaggi wrote:
>
> Got it. Thanks for the suggestion.
>
Great! How did you fix it? Would you mind to place pull request?
>
> As to the second point - is there a way to determine the order in which
> the parameters are referenced in the
Yes, that's exactly right. I want to repeatedly evaluate that function.
If you look into my next post, I had two lambdify solutions - one involved
partially closing the function using subs, and using lambdify each cycle,
but that added a lot of overhead. The other involved using lambdify
out
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Federico Vaggi
wrote:
> https://gist.github.com/FedericoV/7132880 here you go.
I see --- the line is just too long. If you write it like this:
REAL*8 function autofunc(Gal, empty, fullbound_RE, fullbound_closed_RE, &
k_base_synt_p53, k_bindleft_p53_RE, &
Got it. Thanks for the suggestion.
As to the second point - is there a way to determine the order in which the
parameters are referenced in the function?
The problem I'm dealing with is something like this:
where sympy_equations are a series of symbolic sympy expressions, that have
a number o
On Thursday, October 24, 2013 9:45:43 AM UTC+2, Federico Vaggi wrote:
>
> https://gist.github.com/FedericoV/7132880 here you go.
>
It looks like the function statment line needs to be continued on several
lines, and it should be quite easy to fix.
If you look at line 693 of the file sympy/utili
https://gist.github.com/FedericoV/7132880 here you go.
This equation is passed to odeint to numerically integrate. Originally, I
tried using .subs() to close the function over all the parameters, and to
them pass a function where only the variables were open to odeint, but the
overhead from us
