On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Alan Bromborsky wrote:
>
> How should I send you the documentation I have generated with sphinx for
> the modules I have written.
The best thing is to write a patch with respect to the latest sympy,
see our tutorial here:
http://docs.sympy.org/sympy-patches-tuto
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Alan Bromborsky wrote:
>
>> How should I send you the documentation I have generated with sphinx for
>> the modules I have written.
>>
>
> The best thing is to write a patch with respect to the latest sympy,
> see our tutorial here:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Alan Bromborsky wrote:
>
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Alan Bromborsky wrote:
>>
>>> How should I send you the documentation I have generated with sphinx for
>>> the modules I have written.
>>>
>>
>> The best thing is to write a patc
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Phillip M.
Feldman wrote:
>
> I'd like to be able to calculate symbolic Sums (finite and infinite).
> From searches of this discussion group, it's clear that this can be
> done, but I can't find any relevant documentation. Any pointers will
> be appreciated.
We
On Jul 30, 2:52 pm, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> We are missing good documentation for this, but look here for tons of
> examples how to evaluate sums symbolically and numerically:
>
> sympy/concrete/tests/test_sums_products.py
>
> Ondrej
BTW: What about using sum_ or Sum instead of overwriting Python
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Vinzent
Steinberg wrote:
>
> On Jul 30, 2:52 pm, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> We are missing good documentation for this, but look here for tons of
>> examples how to evaluate sums symbolically and numerically:
>>
>> sympy/concrete/tests/test_sums_products.py
>>
>> Ond
Something must be missing from that URL (I've tried various prefixes,
but couldn't make any of them work).
Phillip
> We are missing good documentation for this, but look here for tons of
> examples how to evaluate sums symbolically and numerically:
>
> sympy/concrete/tests/test_sums_products.py
I hate underscores, but Sum with a capital S seems reasonable. When
doing the import, one could choose to import SymPy.sum as Sum, but it
would be more convenient to be able to do 'from SymPy import *' and
get everything at one shot.
>
> BTW: What about using sum_ or Sum instead of overwriting Py
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Phillip M.
Feldman wrote:
>
> Something must be missing from that URL (I've tried various prefixes,
> but couldn't make any of them work).
I mean the path in the sympy checkout or tarball.
Ondrej
>
> Phillip
>
>> We are missing good documentation for this, but
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Phillip M. Feldman
wrote:
>
> I hate underscores, but Sum with a capital S seems reasonable. When
> doing the import, one could choose to import SymPy.sum as Sum, but it
> would be more convenient to be able to do 'from SymPy import *' and
> get everything at one
Why not just read the code and put into words what you have
understood? The community can then review your documentation and
provide suggestions/corrections wherever appropriate.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, se
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Saptarshi Mandal
wrote:
> Why not just read the code and put into words what you have
> understood? The community can then review your documentation and
> provide suggestions/corrections wherever appropriate.
That would be great. Any help with the documentation is
Sorry! please disregard - didn't realize 0.7.5 had already been released!
On Thursday, 27 March 2014 11:55:22 UTC+1, Björn Dahlgren wrote:
>
> Looks like the links in the docs are broken in the galgebra module:
>
> http://docs.sympy.org/0.7.4.1/modules/galgebra/index.html
>
> which links to e.g.
>
I've fixed the urls in the 0.7.4.1 and 0.7.4 docs.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Björn Dahlgren wrote:
> Sorry! please disregard - didn't realize 0.7.5 had already been released!
>
>
> On Thursday, 27 March 2014 11:55:22 UTC+1, Björn Dahlgren wrote:
>>
>> Looks like the links in
14 matches
Mail list logo
