I've made a number of bug fixes and added quite a few examples. Unless there is a part that you don't like the api should be stable.
The issue about inclusion is code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2845. I'll change the milestone to 0.7.2. If you do not agree please comment and change it in the issues tracker. The reason that I'm marking it for 0.7.2 is that at least 2 or 3 versions will have to have deprecation warnings and the sooner the better. The issue concerning the deprecation warnings is here http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2987 Maybe the milestone given there needs adjusting. There are some really cool examples that I've added as notebooks in the pull request. A better place should be found for them but that won't be a problem during the review. On 12 January 2012 01:55, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com < krastanov.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'll greatly appreciate criticism. The PR is here > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/673 > > I'm sure that there are still many issues and bugs to be fixed, but a > review of the general idea will be useful. Tomorrow I'll create issues in > the tracker about merging this, writing tests and docs, etc. > > And it even may turn out that the code is too convoluted for inclusion... > > There are example files in the root dir that should be moved to a better > location. The notebook is attached here in pdf form for those that do not > use ipython. > > Regards > Stefan > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
