On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Kirill Smelkov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 02:59:53PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Riccardo Gori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 22 June 2008 12:47:38 physnut wrote:
hello there, i'm only new to
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Riccardo Gori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 22 June 2008 12:47:38 physnut wrote:
hello there, i'm only new to this project (and haven't started helping
at all
yet...) but wouldn't it be better to retain both versions and give
them
slightly different
hello there, i'm only new to this project (and haven't started helping
at all
yet...) but wouldn't it be better to retain both versions and give
them
slightly different names (and explain there are two in docstrings)? I
am
presuming that the version which modifies the matrix in situ is faster
On Sunday 22 June 2008 12:47:38 physnut wrote:
hello there, i'm only new to this project (and haven't started helping
at all
yet...) but wouldn't it be better to retain both versions and give
them
slightly different names (and explain there are two in docstrings)? I
am
presuming that the
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Riccardo Gori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
playing with matrices.py I found a bug in it:
we have two Matrix.expand(), one at line 244 one at line 823.
The first one returns a matrix with expanded elements.
The second one modify the matrix.
Which
