Re: [sympy] Re: My GSoC 2011 Proposal - Nakul

2011-04-07 Thread Aaron S. Meurer
Go ahead and submit it at google-melange.com. You will be able to edit it up until the deadline tomorrow. Aaron Meurer On Apr 7, 2011, at 5:39 AM, nakul wrote: > Hi, > > I have modified my proposal and have uploaded it again. > > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2011-Application-Naku

[sympy] Re: My GSoC 2011 Proposal - Nakul

2011-04-07 Thread nakul
Hi, I have modified my proposal and have uploaded it again. https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2011-Application-Nakul-Kukar:-Numerical-Solvers-for-PDE It would be very helpful if you could go through it once more and finalise it before tomorrow, so that I can submit it. Thanks Nakul On

[sympy] Re: My GSoC 2011 Proposal - Nakul

2011-04-07 Thread Vinzent Steinberg
On 6 Apr., 13:16, nakul kukar wrote: > Actually I was thinking of using mpmath's linear algebra routines for > implicit solvers so that we need not have any dependency problems for SymPy > which might arise due to possible use of petsc4py or pysparse. But this > thing is open to discussion and can

Re: [sympy] Re: My GSoC 2011 Proposal - Nakul

2011-04-06 Thread nakul kukar
Hi Andy, Thanks for the reply. I am mailing you some explanation. Based on these and your reply I would also modify my proposal. Hello Nakul, > > Thanks for the updates on the proposal. > > It's not common to use arbitrary precision with PDE's, some notable > exceptions being advanced wave tracki

Re: [sympy] Re: My GSoC 2011 Proposal - Nakul

2011-04-05 Thread Andy Ray Terrel
Hello Nakul, Thanks for the updates on the proposal. It's not common to use arbitrary precision with PDE's, some notable exceptions being advanced wave tracking algorithms or predictor-corrector solvers, so I'm not really understanding the connection to mpmath. Usually PDE solvers have to be incr

[sympy] Re: My GSoC 2011 Proposal - Nakul

2011-04-05 Thread nakul
Hi, I have updated my proposal after making the changes suggested by Brian and Andy. You may please have a look and inform me if anything else needs to be corrected. -Nakul On Apr 3, 4:17 pm, nakul wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Thanks for the reply. I just need to do some clarifications and after > th

[sympy] Re: My GSoC 2011 Proposal - Nakul

2011-04-03 Thread nakul
Hi Brian, Thanks for the reply. I just need to do some clarifications and after that I would straight away make modifications to my proposal. 1) As I said there should be both implicit and explicit schemes, so I was thinking of coding explicit Euler and Implicit Crank-Nicholson time stepping Meth