On 24/03/2023 15:38, Chris Smith wrote:
>>> sum(f(i) for i in range(3)) == Sum(f(i), (i,0,2)).doit() == f(0) +
f(1) + f(2)
True
On Friday, March 24, 2023 at 3:31:32 AM UTC-5 da...@dbailey.co.uk wrote:
On 24/03/2023 02:25, Chris Smith wrote:
> David, please start a new thread (and try I
>>> sum(f(i) for i in range(3)) == Sum(f(i), (i,0,2)).doit() == f(0) + f(1)
+ f(2)
True
On Friday, March 24, 2023 at 3:31:32 AM UTC-5 da...@dbailey.co.uk wrote:
> On 24/03/2023 02:25, Chris Smith wrote:
> > David, please start a new thread (and try IndexedBase instead of
> > Function and use []
On 24/03/2023 02:25, Chris Smith wrote:
David, please start a new thread (and try IndexedBase instead of
Function and use [] instead of ()).
Thanks, I did consider that, but I thought that undefined functions can
simply participate in algebraic expressions in exactly the same way as
they woul
David, please start a new thread (and try IndexedBase instead of Function
and use [] instead of ()).
WRT CHATGPT: talk with it for a while trying to get it to compute the norm
of (1/2, 1, 1). When you tell it not to skip steps it can get it right, but
it is hard to get it to give you the correc
