On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One design pattern that I see in many places in sympy is that other
> objects are not very encasulated. Let me give an example:
>
> Take printers. My initial expectation is that each object itself
> would be responsibl
>> But, in sympy, the printer class has all of these methods for all the
>> classes that need to be printed. Why is it done this way?
>
> See issue 908 for some details. (
> http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=908 )
I skimmed quickly through some of this and it does sound like there
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> But, in sympy, the printer class has all of these methods for all the
>>> classes that need to be printed. Why is it done this way?
>>
>> See issue 908 for some details. (
>> http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/det
Ondrej,
OK, gives me a bit more context about the history of all of this.
But, I am definitely in favor of the localizing logic into classes as
much as possible. I will be interested to hear what others think
about this proposal.
I am crazy busy this week, so I won't have any time to hack on sy
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 20:09, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ondrej,
>
> OK, gives me a bit more context about the history of all of this.
> But, I am definitely in favor of the localizing logic into classes as
> much as possible. I will be interested to hear what others think
> abo
I think it's a good proposal of Brian and I sent a patch with an
implementation to
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches/browse_thread/thread/9f8392a8fec0b3e8
Sebastian Krämer
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 20:09, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Ondrej,
>>
>> OK, gives me a bit more context about the history of all of this.
>> But, I am definitely in favor of the localizing logic into clas
