[sympy] Re: checking for a lambda

2010-07-06 Thread James Pearson
Well, I guess we *don't* actually want all callables, since that causes some issues with classes that have __call__ defined. http://dpaste.com/215213/ . Bummer. Here is the patch for option 2: http://github.com/xiongchiamiov/sympy/compare/tempfix . I tested with python 2.4 and 2.7rc2 (with -3).

Re: [sympy] Re: checking for a lambda

2010-07-06 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:59 AM, James Pearson james.m.pear...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I guess we *don't* actually want all callables, since that causes some issues with classes that have __call__ defined. http://dpaste.com/215213/ . Bummer. Too bad. Here is the patch for option 2:

[sympy] Re: checking for a lambda

2010-07-06 Thread Kevin Hunter
My previous post notwithstanding, you could also use the inspect class, available since Python v2.1: http://docs.python.org/library/inspect.html . I believe isfunction is what you want. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy group. To post to this

[sympy] Re: checking for a lambda

2010-07-06 Thread Kevin Hunter
I tested with python 2.4 and 2.7rc2 (with -3). FYI, 2.7 was released on Saturday! Yay! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy group. To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to