On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:31:35AM -0700, Kalevi Suominen wrote:
>On Sunday, September 28, 2014 5:19:09 PM UTC+3, Sergey Kirpichev wrote:
> Oh, no. It's just the Legendre complete elliptic integral of the second
> kind. Please read the docs.
>
> Yes, you are right. But denoting
thanks
On Sunday, September 28, 2014 9:15:29 AM UTC-5, Sergey Kirpichev wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, September 28, 2014 5:15:06 AM UTC+4, Chris Smith wrote:
>>
>> elliptic_e can take 1 or two args but the _eval_conjugate assumes 2 (and
>> fails in a branch I am working on). The following mod works w
On Sunday, September 28, 2014 5:19:09 PM UTC+3, Sergey Kirpichev wrote:
>
> Oh, no. It's just the Legendre complete elliptic integral of the second
> kind. Please read the docs.
>
> Yes, you are right. But denoting the argument by z is very confusing as
it really is the modulus. There ar
On Sunday, September 28, 2014 2:18:42 PM UTC+4, Kalevi Suominen wrote:
>
>
> The one-argument form of elliptic-e is useless (in is present form)
> because the modulus has no default value.
>
Oh, no. It's just the Legendre complete elliptic integral of the second
kind. Please read the docs.
On Sunday, September 28, 2014 5:15:06 AM UTC+4, Chris Smith wrote:
>
> elliptic_e can take 1 or two args but the _eval_conjugate assumes 2 (and
> fails in a branch I am working on). The following mod works without
> returning anything for the 1 arg case, but can someone tell me if I should
> b
On Sunday, September 28, 2014 4:15:06 AM UTC+3, Chris Smith wrote:
>
> elliptic_e can take 1 or two args but the _eval_conjugate assumes 2 (and
> fails in a branch I am working on). The following mod works without
> returning anything for the 1 arg case, but can someone tell me if I should
> b
