[sympy] Re: request for 'non-parametric' functions

2009-02-25 Thread Andrew Straw
Jonathan Taylor wrote: > This is a request is for a subclass of Function that can be > given a callable and a set of symbols such that whenever > it is finally to be evaluated via sympy.lambdify you get the > callable function of its 'symbols'. It may already be possible, but I > can't find out ho

[sympy] Re: request for 'non-parametric' functions

2009-02-26 Thread jtaylor74
Yes, I think it's related and I have used the DeferredVector which is quite useful. I guess you could say I want a DeferredFunction class. -- Jonathan On Feb 25, 10:39 pm, Andrew Straw wrote: > Jonathan Taylor wrote: > > This is a request is for a subclass of Function that can be > > given a c

[sympy] Re: request for 'non-parametric' functions

2009-02-26 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Jonathan, On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:33 PM, jtaylor74 wrote: > > Yes, I think it's related and I have used the DeferredVector which is > quite useful. I guess you could say I want a DeferredFunction class. thanks for your request. I think it would be useful to have it. Do you have some ideas

[sympy] Re: request for 'non-parametric' functions

2009-02-26 Thread Andrew Straw
Ondrej Certik wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:33 PM, jtaylor74 wrote: >> Yes, I think it's related and I have used the DeferredVector which is >> quite useful. I guess you could say I want a DeferredFunction class. > > thanks for your request. I think it would be useful to

[sympy] Re: request for 'non-parametric' functions

2009-02-26 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Andrew Straw wrote: > > Ondrej Certik wrote: >> Hi Jonathan, >> >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:33 PM, jtaylor74 wrote: >>> Yes, I think it's related and I have used the DeferredVector which is >>> quite useful. I guess you could say I want a DeferredFunction class