Dear Group,
I notice this item in the highlights of 1.6.
DEPRECATION: Passing Poly as the integrand to the |integrate| function
or |Integral| class is now deprecated. Use the integrate method instead
e.g. |Poly(x, x).integrate(x)|
|I do feel a little uneasy about pushing people to use object
On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 23:39, David Bailey wrote:
>
> Dear Group,
>
> I notice this item in the highlights of 1.6.
>
> DEPRECATION: Passing Poly as the integrand to the integrate function or
> Integral class is now deprecated. Use the integrate method instead e.g.
> Poly(x, x).integrate(x)
>
> I
On 14/05/2020 01:13, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 23:39, David Bailey wrote:
Dear Group,
I notice this item in the highlights of 1.6.
DEPRECATION: Passing Poly as the integrand to the integrate function or
Integral class is now deprecated. Use the integrate method instead e.g
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 08:01, David Bailey wrote:
>
>
> Well I assumed all along that Poly objects were a much more efficient way of
> representing polynomials - presumably an array of tuples of coefficients and
> exponents where the coefficient is non-zero. If these things are all
> converted