ok. I will move the extension to the interactive module.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sympy/-/3v-aNxjgqjAJ.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegr
For what it's worth, Min (two other core IPython devs) also agrees.
See https://github.com/ipython/ipython/pull/1773#issuecomment-5996649.
And given the fact that the only IPython developer that knows the
SymPy internals pretty well is Brian, I think the extension will see
much more love inside of
I am fine if sympyprinting moves to sympy proper. IPython's extension
loading mechanism works fine with anything in sys.path so we could do:
%load_ext sympy.sympyprinting
Or something like this. It should also remain in IPython though for
the transition period.
Cheers,
Brian
On Fri, Jun 15,
On 15 June 2012 11:03, Bharath M R wrote:
>
> I have been trying to get this working.
>
> Should we also bring the sympyprinting extension in IPython to sympy or
> leave it there?
> For additional configuration, we can have an ipython_config in interactive
> and call it when
> we run ipython with
I have been trying to get this working.
Should we also bring the sympyprinting extension in IPython to sympy or
leave it there?
For additional configuration, we can have an ipython_config in interactive
and call it when
we run ipython with sympy.
--
You received this message because you are
Am 28.04.2012 00:33, schrieb Aaron Meurer:
However as it is a blocker on one of my pull request I will actually
try to do it now that I have your approval.
(in a week as I have many exams at the moment)
If my approval is all it takes, then I hereby approve everybody to
implement any idea or fix
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:11 PM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
wrote:
>>
>> Yes, let's do it. Will you be able to do it? The relevant SymPy
>> issues are 3031, 2632, and 2945.
>>
> Well my mail was more of a plead "please somebody do it" ;)
Well I won't be free to do it for at least two weeks, wh
>
> Yes, let's do it. Will you be able to do it? The relevant SymPy
> issues are 3031, 2632, and 2945.
>
Well my mail was more of a plead "please somebody do it" ;)
However as it is a blocker on one of my pull request I will actually
try to do it now that I have your approval.
(in a week as I h
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:54 PM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Sometime ago I mentioned that for the correct working of the new
> plotting module (actually only for the matplotlib backend) one must do
> some magic with the event loops. It seems that this magic was so hard
> that the matplotl
Sometime ago I mentioned that for the correct working of the new
plotting module (actually only for the matplotlib backend) one must do
some magic with the event loops. It seems that this magic was so hard
that the matplotlib documentation simply states that if you want
interactive non-blocking plo
10 matches
Mail list logo
