Just a heads-up on what is going on:
I requested a certain option for processing notebooks on the
command-line, so we can only keep the unevaluated version in git:
https://github.com/ipython/ipython/issues/1675
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy"
On 28 April 2012 23:19, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> This sounds good to me. So it would look something like this:
>
> - All of our git tracked examples will be in .ipnb format.
> - The test script calls nbconvert on the examples, and runs the .py
> files. These are not tracked by git.
> - At release t
This sounds good to me. So it would look something like this:
- All of our git tracked examples will be in .ipnb format.
- The test script calls nbconvert on the examples, and runs the .py
files. These are not tracked by git.
- At release time, we use nbconvert to convert the notebook files to
p
This has cropped up a number of times already. The main points:
- ipython notebooks are great for examples from pedagogical point of view
- there is no standard way to run tests on them
- there is no standard way to add them to sphinx docs (this
http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/sampledoc/ipython_
