Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #13 on issue 724 by ondrej.certik: solve(Eq(x**4+x+1, 0), x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=724
I think this is fixed, even though the solution is so long, that google code
complains Comment is too long.
In [1]: solve(Eq(x**4+x+1,
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-Release0.6.4
Comment #9 on issue 1120 by ondrej.certik: solve(Eq(cos(x), sin(x)), x)
hangs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1120
This should be fixed before a release.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.6.4 Milestone-Release0.6.5
Comment #6 on issue 1264 by ondrej.certik: Discrepancies between running
the full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 1283 by ondrej.certik: can't print tuples to mathml
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1283
I think this is fixed.
In [1]: from sympy.printing import mathml
In [2]: mathml([S.One/2])
Out[2]: 'listcn1/2/cn/list'
--
You received
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview -Milestone-Release0.6.4 Milestone-Release0.6.5
Comment #10 on issue 694 by ondrej.certik: Add tests from Review of CAS
mathematical capabilities, by Michael Wester
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=694
I rebased your commits, available here:
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.6.4 Milestone-Release0.6.5
Comment #4 on issue 1222 by ondrej.certik: numpy.array(Matrix()) dump and
then load fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1222
Any help with this is appreciated.
--
You received this message because you
Updates:
Cc: fredrik.johansson
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.6.4
Comment #21 on issue 1052 by ondrej.certik: 2.0 * x**2 should print more
nicely
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1052
Fredrik, how does the new mpmath printing affects this? I'd like to get
this
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.6.4 Milestone-Release0.6.5
Comment #15 on issue 1047 by ondrej.certik: Suggested new assumption system
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1047
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.6.4 Milestone-Release0.6.5
Comment #8 on issue 841 by ondrej.certik: integrate(exp(-x**2)*exp(I*k*x),
(x, -oo, oo)) doesn't calculate the integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=841
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You