Comment #7 on issue 1305 by fab...@fseoane.net: sympy.roots not working for
slightly more complicated polynomials
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1305
not sure how we should check for exact result, as the output formula is
really
unreadable ...
and check the result by subtitu
Comment #5 on issue 1306 by fab...@fseoane.net: Test the rst docs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1306
i'm having a problem with the following line:
>>> (cos(3*x)).match(f(p*x))
{p_: 3, f_: cos}
line 702 of tutorial.txt.
Plus, WildFunction is very badly documented an
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-Release0.6.4
Comment #6 on issue 1306 by fab...@fseoane.net: Test the rst docs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1306
i'm taking care of this and raising to milestone 0.6.4. It would be very
sad to have
outdated docs with this release.
--
You r
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1350 by fab...@fseoane.net: Is WildFunction broken?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1350
The code from the doc's don't run:
>>> p = Wild('p')
>>> g = WildFunction('g', nofargs=2)
>>> (5*cos(
Comment #1 on issue 1350 by fab...@fseoane.net: Is WildFunction broken?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1350
it seems nofargs was never implemented ...
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
Comment #2 on issue 1350 by ondrej.certik: Is WildFunction broken?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1350
The only things that work are the ones that we test for in our tests.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because y
Comment #9 on issue 1297 by fab...@fseoane.net: examples don't run
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1297
ok, that fixes it for running all.py, but as andy said, it does not fix it
for
running individual examples, which is IMHO what most users will do, so i
would say we
need a
Comment #1 on issue 1335 by fab...@fseoane.net: WildFunction() broken
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1335
Issue 1350 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1335
Comment #3 on issue 1350 by fab...@fseoane.net: Is WildFunction broken?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1350
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or
Comment #10 on issue 1297 by ondrej.certik: examples don't run
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1297
There used to be a script
import i_am_a_sympy_example
that fixed all the paths correctly. Is there some other way to fix it?
--
You received this message because you are listed
Comment #6 on issue 935 by fab...@fseoane.net: .match() behaves in a random
manner.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=935
> However, the pattern matching implementation should not depend on it.
+1 on that
to achieve consistency maybe we should not only match the expression (man
Comment #7 on issue 935 by rwnobrega: .match() behaves in a random manner.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=935
@Fabian
But how could one compare two given matches to say which one is the "best"?
Is there
any objective metric?
--
You received this message because you are liste
Comment #11 on issue 1297 by andy.terrel: examples don't run
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1297
We could put this back in but the problem was you would need it in each
subdirectory
to insure that you were able to reference it in each example.
This breaks the don't repeat you
Comment #8 on issue 935 by fab...@fseoane.net: .match() behaves in a random
manner.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=935
This is a topic in which i don't know much, i confess, but there are some
papers who
talk about this:
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1005298
and fro
Comment #4 on issue 1276 by fab...@fseoane.net: solve(-1 + x**2 +
0.111*(1.00 + 2.00*x)**2,x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1276
function nsimplify could be used to transform float's into fractions.
--
You received this message becau
Comment #9 on issue 935 by fab...@fseoane.net: .match() behaves in a random
manner.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=935
just found a direct link to that paper:
http://www.cas.mcmaster.ca/~carette/publications/simplification.pdf
--
You received this message because you are lis
Updates:
Status: PassedReview
Labels: -NeedsReview
Comment #1 on issue 1345 by ondrej.certik: trigsimp(sin(x)/cos(x)) fixed
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1345
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the o
Comment #2 on issue 1346 by ondrej.certik: hack from a fraction() removed
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1346
I think I forgot to attach a patch.
Attachments:
0001-Removing-the-hack-from-fraction-as-it-is-not-neces.patch 833 bytes
--
You received this message because
Updates:
Status: PassedReview
Comment #1 on issue 1344 by ondrej.certik: recusive trigsimp implemented
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1344
This was reviewed by Alan on the sympy list:
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy/msg/a0221abf9cf80cfd
--
You received this messag
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview
Comment #2 on issue 1344 by ondrej.certik: recusive trigsimp implemented
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1344
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this iss
Updates:
Status: PassedReview
Labels: -NeedsReview
Comment #4 on issue 1342 by ondrej.certik: Calulating a series expansion
hangs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1342
Thanks, we'll merge it soon.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
Updates:
Status: PassedReview
Labels: -NeedsReview
Comment #8 on issue 1305 by ondrej.certik: sympy.roots not working for
slightly more complicated polynomials
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1305
Ok, I'll merge both patches soon.
--
You received this message b
Comment #12 on issue 1297 by ondrej.certik: examples don't run
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1297
yes, I suggest to just merge my patch, so that it's easy to run all
examples, no
matter what's in your path and leave the other things for people to fix the
PYTHONPATH.
Is it
Status: Accepted
Owner: ondrej.certik
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High Milestone-Release0.6.4
New issue 1351 by ondrej.certik: make Integral.subs() work
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1351
In [3]: f = Lambda(x, exp(-x**2))
In [4]: conv = Integral(f(x-y)*f(y), (y, -oo, oo))
In
Status: Accepted
Owner: ondrej.certik
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High Milestone-Release0.6.4
New issue 1352 by ondrej.certik: Make lambdify work with Integral:
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1352
This should work:
In [3]: f = Lambda(x, exp(-x**2))
In [9]: l = lambdify(x, Int
Status: Accepted
Owner: ondrej.certik
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Milestone-Release0.6.5
New issue 1353 by ondrej.certik: solve() doesn't work with Sage
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1353
sage: var("E R T A beta")
(E, R, T, A, beta)
sage: eq = (E/(R*T**2) == A/beta * ex
26 matches
Mail list logo
