Comment #17 on issue 1455 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Split expand so that it
only expands a*(x+y) => a*x+a*y
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1455
I'm very positive about the functionality and the tests.
There is a massive amount of code duplication, the following snippet occurs
m
Issue 252: automatic combining of exponentials and logarithms
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=252
This issue is now blocking issue 1455.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1455
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this
Comment #22 on issue 252 by Vinzent.Steinberg: automatic combining of
exponentials and logarithms
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=252
> Use powsimp(expr, deep=True, combine='exp')
Is deep the same as recursive? If yes, we should be consistent and use only
one variant.
--
Yo
Updates:
Blockedon: 252
Comment #18 on issue 1455 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Split expand so that it
only expands a*(x+y) => a*x+a*y
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1455
I'm very positive about the functionality and the tests.
There is a massive amount of code duplication,
Comment #23 on issue 252 by Vinzent.Steinberg: automatic combining of
exponentials and logarithms
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=252
Do we still need your distribute()? I think it might be super-seeded by
your code in
issue 1455.
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #24 on issue 252 by asmeurer: automatic combining of exponentials
and logarithms
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=252
Deep is the same as recursive. Deep is the old keyword argument from
powsimp, whereas recursive is what was
suggested for me to use with expand. I ag
Comment #19 on issue 1455 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Split expand so that it
only expands a*(x+y) => a*x+a*y
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1455
I'm getting these failures with you branch:
_ sympy/series/tests/test_nseries.py:test_bug2
_
File "
Updates:
Blockedon: 1455
Comment #4 on issue 1445 by Vinzent.Steinberg: expand Integral fails when
integration expression is expandable
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1445
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in
Issue 1455: Split expand so that it only expands a*(x+y) => a*x+a*y
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1455
This issue is now blocking issue 1445.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1445
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields o
Comment #20 on issue 1455 by asmeurer: Split expand so that it only expands
a*(x+y) => a*x+a*y
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1455
Those are related to the exponential combining patches from issue 1445.
Hopefully, I will be able to get those
fixed soon. If you just apply m
Comment #2 on issue 1477 by goodrich.ben: Printing with double subscripts
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1477
Happy to write tests, but I am not sure how to automatically test printing.
Of
course, I can define various symbols and verify that latex() does not throw
an error,
Comment #21 on issue 1455 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Split expand so that it
only expands a*(x+y) => a*x+a*y
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1455
IIRC, I can't apply your patch without those from issue 1445, so I just
tried your
branch.
--
You received this message because you ar
12 matches
Mail list logo