Comment #2 on issue 1483 by fredrik.johansson: no xor in sympy.core.basic
for new logic module
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1483
What is Xand? Did you mean Nand? Nor?
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because
Comment #3 on issue 1483 by fab...@fseoane.net: no xor in sympy.core.basic
for new logic module
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1483
yes, I mean Nand
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.6.7 Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #43 on issue 1047 by fab...@fseoane.net: Suggested new assumption
system
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1047
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #3 on issue 1477 by goodrich.ben: Printing with double subscripts
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1477
OK, I figured out how you all test latex() and now have had time to patch
in a test
for this issue.
Attachments:
0001-latex-test_latex_issue1477.patch 1.0
Comment #4 on issue 1483 by ondrej.certik: no xor in sympy.core.basic for
new logic module
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1483
We already use ^ for exponentiation in sympify(), so I think I would not
override it
to use xor in regular sympy. Otherwise +1.
--
You received
Status: Accepted
Owner: fab...@fseoane.net
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Logic Milestone-Release0.6.5
New issue 1485 by fab...@fseoane.net: new logic module (TODO before 0.6.5)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1485
I open this issue to keep track of what remains to be done
