Issue 1566 in sympy: Allow Integral to be evaluated at only an upper limit

2009-08-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #2 on issue 1566 by asmeurer: Allow Integral to be evaluated at only an upper limit http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1566 I forgot to modify _eval_subs to work with None upper or lower limits. I fixed it on my branch, commit 083634e. -- You received this message

Issue 1558 in sympy: NumberSymbol not recognized as a filter for atoms() and I has only type Atom

2009-08-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #3 on issue 1558 by smichr: NumberSymbol not recognized as a filter for atoms() and I has only type Atom http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1558 Neither I nor zoo derive from NumberSymbol, they derive from Atom. If you make I derive from NumberSymbo, then tests

Issue 1566 in sympy: Allow Integral to be evaluated at only an upper limit

2009-08-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #3 on issue 1566 by andy.terrel: Allow Integral to be evaluated at only an upper limit http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1566 I think the idea with the piecewise would be to find the expr that the eval point is in, then call this function on that expr. -- You received

Issue 1467 in sympy: sorting values with imaginary numbers in radical

2009-08-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #11 on issue 1467 by smichr: sorting values with imaginary numbers in radical http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1467 Ted, regarding the underlying issues: I.is_comparable is False because I derives from Atom, not NumberSymbol. If you change it to be comparable then

Issue 1580 in sympy: Assume(0 x) should repr() to Assume(0 x, 'relational', True)

2009-08-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: Accepted Owner: Vinzent.Steinberg CC: fab...@fseoane.net Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Assumptions EasyToFix Milestone-Release0.6.5 New issue 1580 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Assume(0 x) should repr() to Assume(0 x, 'relational', True)

Issue 1338 in sympy: assert poly is not None in solve

2009-08-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #4 on issue 1338 by asmeurer: assert poly is not None in solve http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1338 By the way, changing it to NotImplementedError doesn't cause any tests to fail. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Issue 1581 in sympy: subs(dict()) sometimes breaks

2009-08-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1581 by ondrej.certik: subs(dict()) sometimes breaks http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1581 In [1]: N = 3 In [2]: (1 + x).subs(dict(N=3)) ERROR: An unexpected error occurred while tokenizing input The

Issue 1552 in sympy: documentation; Gotchas and Pitfalls

2009-08-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 1552 by asmeurer: documentation; Gotchas and Pitfalls http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1552 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue,

Issue 1581 in sympy: subs(dict()) sometimes breaks

2009-08-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #1 on issue 1581 by gabrielgellner: subs(dict()) sometimes breaks http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1581 To clarify the example In[1]: N = sympy.Symbol('N') In[2]: (1 + N).subs(dict(N=3)) causes the above error but In[3]: (1 + N).subs({N: 3}) works. whereas the