Re: Issue 1695 in sympy: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result

Comment #40 on issue 1695 by Vinzent.Steinberg: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1695 Thank you for the code! Yes, Jorn's code is now in sympy's master. Please just do $ git checkout master $ git pull $ git checkout

Re: Issue 1671 in sympy: runtests modifications and docstring corrections

Comment #44 on issue 1671 by smichr: runtests modifications and docstring corrections http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1671 They are now sorted in reverse order (so editing doesn't throw off the numbers). Doctests are strict by default, normal when using -n option (use -h to

Re: Issue 1671 in sympy: runtests modifications and docstring corrections

Comment #45 on issue 1671 by smichr: runtests modifications and docstring corrections http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1671 ...tutorials still have from sympy import * in them, however. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Issue 1704 in sympy: [PATCH] Integration of certain composite functions fails

Status: Accepted Owner: jorn.baayen CC: Vinzent.Steinberg, ondrej.certik Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview New issue 1704 by jorn.baayen: [PATCH] Integration of certain composite functions fails http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1704 x_max = Symbol(x_max)

Re: Issue 1705 in sympy: [PATCH] _separatevars_dict: Fix issue where unintended symbols would be selected

Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch Comment #1 on issue 1705 by asmeurer: [PATCH] _separatevars_dict: Fix issue where unintended symbols would be selected http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1705 Thanks for the patch. I've been waiting for some kind of bug to

Re: Issue 1705 in sympy: [PATCH] _separatevars_dict: Fix issue where unintended symbols would be selected

Updates: Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview Comment #2 on issue 1705 by jorn.baayen: [PATCH] _separatevars_dict: Fix issue where unintended symbols would be selected http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1705 Okay, done. Thanks for the review! Attachments:

Re: Issue 1694 in sympy: solve has many issues with fractions

Comment #8 on issue 1694 by smichr: solve has many issues with fractions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694 In the segment to check if Q != 0, you simply test Q without expanding or simplifying. But simple exressions like the following will not test to be zero unless you

Re: Issue 1705 in sympy: [PATCH] _separatevars_dict: Fix issue where unintended symbols would be selected

Updates: Cc: asmeurer Comment #3 on issue 1705 by smichr: [PATCH] _separatevars_dict: Fix issue where unintended symbols would be selected http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1705 I looked at this and things look good. Since this function is being edited (and since there

Re: Issue 1704 in sympy: [PATCH] Integration of certain composite functions fails

Updates: Cc: mattpap Labels: Integration Comment #1 on issue 1704 by Vinzent.Steinberg: [PATCH] Integration of certain composite functions fails http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1704 There is basically one who understands the algorithm completely. :) -- You

Re: Issue 1705 in sympy: [PATCH] _separatevars_dict: Fix issue where unintended symbols would be selected

Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview Comment #4 on issue 1705 by asmeurer: [PATCH] _separatevars_dict: Fix issue where unintended symbols would be selected http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1705 I am +1 on the existing patch. If Jorn or Chris want to make more