Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Comment #19 on issue 1598 by smichr: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 Was I right in deleting trim and cancel from simplify, Matteusz? Also, factor still should be doing something different. It's failing to factor this function: >>> from

Issue 1731 in sympy: fraction can be more flexible

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: smichr CC: ondrej.certik, Vinzent.Steinberg, asmeurer Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Low NeedsReview New issue 1731 by smichr: fraction can be more flexible http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1731 From the commit of smichr's 1731 branch at github: == sympy/s

Re: Issue 1729 in sympy: doctest failure on new master for Windows 32 sys

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Comment #2 on issue 1729 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: doctest failure on new master for Windows 32 sys http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1729 I've played a bit with this, the results returned by roots_quartic are awfully complicated. For instance, I found no way of proving that re(r

Re: Issue 1729 in sympy: doctest failure on new master for Windows 32 sys

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Comment #1 on issue 1729 by smichr: doctest failure on new master for Windows 32 sys http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1729 This is corrected in the branch for review at Issue 1730. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or be

Issue 1730 in sympy: solver and ode updates

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: smichr CC: Vinzent.Steinberg, asmeurer Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview New issue 1730 by smichr: solver and ode updates http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1730 From the commit message of smichr's 1730 branch at github: == sympy/polys/rootfin

Re: Issue 1719 in sympy: implement from sympy.abc import lower, greek

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Comment #5 on issue 1719 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: implement from sympy.abc import lower, greek http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1719 In from sympy.abc import ..., you are following a file path: python fetches the module abc.py inside sympy/. On the other hand, sympy.abc is the

Issue 1729 in sympy: doctest failure on new master for Windows 32 sys

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: smichr Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1729 by smichr: doctest failure on new master for Windows 32 sys http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1729 Recent master ha a failing doctest: sympy.polys.rootfinding.roots_quartic __

Re: Issue 1719 in sympy: implement from sympy.abc import lower, greek

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Updates: Cc: asmeurer Labels: NeedsReview Comment #4 on issue 1719 by smichr: implement from sympy.abc import lower, greek http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1719 Vinzent...for consideration, branch 1719 has a new abc folder with lower, upper and greek scripts tha

Re: Issue 1656 in sympy: lambdify does not yield Symbolic expressions.

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Comment #6 on issue 1656 by akshaysrinivasan: lambdify does not yield Symbolic expressions. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1656 (No comment was entered for this change.) Attachments: 0001-Modified-lambdify-so-as-to-enable-lambdify-to-return.patch 4.3 KB -- You receiv

Re: Issue 1698 in sympy: why the assert on cols>lines in Matrix.nullspace()?

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Updates: Cc: Vinzent.Steinberg Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview Comment #3 on issue 1698 by smichr: why the assert on cols>lines in Matrix.nullspace()? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1698 Sorry, please check again. -- You received this message because you

Re: Issue 1719 in sympy: implement from sympy.abc import lower, greek

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 1719 by smichr: implement from sympy.abc import lower, greek http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1719 That seems like a good idea...I would be in favor of getting rid of the uppers. By convention those are something usually special (class-like or constants wh

Re: Issue 1727 in sympy: fix namespace clashes

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 1727 by smichr: fix namespace clashes http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1727 I thought I commented on this. FWIW, I like the "summation" suggestion of Aaron's. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or beca

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Comment #18 on issue 1598 by smichr: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 ok, there are some issues to attend to as the test will show and there are a couple of things discussed in the commit. I think I've got it rebased properly. See the po

Re: Issue 1695 in sympy: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Comment #50 on issue 1695 by Vinzent.Steinberg: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1695 Thank you Ronan, here a few comments: * NoUnionError should at least subclass from ValueError, if not be replaced with this. * 'type(...) ==

Re: Issue 282 in sympy: symbols becoming functions

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Comment #10 on issue 282 by Vinzent.Steinberg: symbols becoming functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=282 Indeed this could possibly fix issue 1612, we'll see. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred

Re: Issue 1727 in sympy: fix namespace clashes

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Comment #2 on issue 1727 by Vinzent.Steinberg: fix namespace clashes http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1727 Do wou think we could replace sum with Sum or Sum.doit? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred th

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Comment #17 on issue 1598 by Vinzent.Steinberg: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 Great, looking forward! Maybe we should release 0.6.6 before without new polynomials? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC

Re: Issue 1722 in sympy: atomic mass unit (amu, u) is defined wrong

2009-11-30 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 1722 by nils.win...@googlemail.com: atomic mass unit (amu, u) is defined wrong http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1722 Not so good. The atomic mass unit is actually has the dimension of a mass and has the value of ~ 1.66e- 27 kg[1], I think you are confusing w