Re: Issue 1770 in sympy: runtests could be more conservative in printing

2009-12-28 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch Comment #10 on issue 1770 by asmeurer: runtests could be more conservative in printing http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1770 I can verify that the paths work correctly now. I don't know how to get around that printing issue. -- You r

Re: Issue 1778 in sympy: Rational from string can be improved

2009-12-28 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch Comment #9 on issue 1778 by asmeurer: Rational from string can be improved http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1778 I guess the only question is, do we want Rational to behave this way: In [2]: print Rational(.3*x) 3*x/10 instea

Re: Issue 1725 in sympy: Implement switch manager for expand() and possibly others

2009-12-28 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch Comment #14 on issue 1725 by asmeurer: Implement switch manager for expand() and possibly others http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1725 I have several comments for this commit, so I posted them as comments on your github rep

Re: Issue 1778 in sympy: Rational from string can be improved

2009-12-28 Thread sympy
Comment #10 on issue 1778 by smichr: Rational from string can be improved http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1778 When someone writes R('.3*x') there is no ambiguity about the .3; when one write R(.3) there is ambiguity about which neither Rational nor Decimal wish to guess. So t