Re: Issue 1807 in sympy: coverage_report improvement

Comment #7 on issue 1807 by asmeurer: coverage_report improvement http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1807 So I am now not even sure that this really works, though it seemed to when I first tested it. I applied this on top of a WIP branch of mine because I am trying to improve cov

Re: Issue 1820 in sympy: Rational(Rational(1,2),Rational(1,3)) should not be nan

Updates: Blockedon: 1778 Comment #2 on issue 1820 by asmeurer: Rational(Rational(1,2),Rational(1,3)) should not be nan http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1820 I can't cherry pick this without first applying the 1778 commit. -- You received this message because you are li

Re: Issue 1778 in sympy: Rational from string can be improved

Issue 1778: Rational from string can be improved http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1778 This issue is now blocking issue 1820. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1820 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or be

Re: Issue 1822 in sympy: A.berkowitz_eigenvalues()

Comment #1 on issue 1822 by asmeurer: A.berkowitz_eigenvalues() http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1822 It works for me in the trunk. What version of sympy are you using? In [5]: A = Matrix(([0, 1, 0, 0, 0], [4, 0, 2, 0, 0], [0, 3, 0, 3, 0], [0, 0, 2, 0, 4], [0, 0, 0, 1, 0])) In [

Issue 1822 in sympy: A.berkowitz_eigenvalues()

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1822 by nils106: A.berkowitz_eigenvalues() http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1822 Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_berkowitz.py", line 27, in print A.berkowitz_eigenvalues() File "/home/nwag

Re: Issue 1814 in sympy: Internal ODE cleanup

Comment #7 on issue 1814 by asmeurer: Internal ODE cleanup http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1814 But 0 is already take for the coefficient of the "zeroith" derivative, f(x). -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because yo

Re: Issue 1766 in sympy: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive

Comment #55 on issue 1766 by mattpap: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766 BTW: http://vimperator.org/ ;) I installed vimperator about a year ago. Now I can't imagine using firefox without it. -- You received this message becaus

Re: Issue 1766 in sympy: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive

Comment #54 on issue 1766 by smichr: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766 it's fixed (again) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjus

Re: Issue 1766 in sympy: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive

Comment #53 on issue 1766 by Vinzent.Steinberg: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766 The test passes for me now, however there is still a print statement left. :) BTW: http://vimperator.org/ ;) -- You received this message because