Issue 1825 in sympy: radsimp a little more discretionary

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: smichr Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview New issue 1825 by smichr: radsimp a little more discretionary http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1825 radsimp did its simplification even if it lead to a less simpler expression. A modified version that l

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Comment #81 on issue 1598 by mattpap: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 If I understand you correctly, then this is all about sympifying 'b' before doing the comparison, right? -- You received this message because you are listed in the o

Issue 1826 in sympy: oo matching problem

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: smichr Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1826 by smichr: oo matching problem http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1826 When doing a match it seems that if some values are returned in the match dictionary then *all* terms should appear in the diction

Re: Issue 1577 in sympy: match doesn't put every wild as a key

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Comment #5 on issue 1577 by asmeurer: match doesn't put every wild as a key http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1577 Issue 1826 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this i

Re: Issue 1826 in sympy: oo matching problem

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 1577 Comment #1 on issue 1826 by asmeurer: oo matching problem http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1826 Actually, I already reported this. There's a bit of a discussion on the other issue. Ronan makes some good points. -- Y

Issue 1827 in sympy: log eval gives more standard form

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: smichr Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview New issue 1827 by smichr: log eval gives more standard form http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1827 Although log's eval handles powers of the base, it doesn't remove powers from something like 2**3*3**3 t

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Comment #82 on issue 1598 by smichr: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 I'm not sure that I understand you :-) In the comparison method, I would write def __eq__(a, b): if not isinstance(b, AlgebraicNumber): return False ...

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Comment #83 on issue 1598 by Vinzent.Steinberg: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 isinstance() is slow. (That's why we have all the .is_Class stuff.) But I'm not sure whether it's slower than sympyfying b. -- You received this message

Re: Issue 1826 in sympy: oo matching problem

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Comment #2 on issue 1826 by smichr: oo matching problem http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1826 Comments continued in issue 1557. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issu

Re: Issue 1826 in sympy: oo matching problem

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 1826 by smichr: oo matching problem http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1826 continued in issue 1577 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notifica

Re: Issue 1577 in sympy: match doesn't put every wild as a key

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Comment #6 on issue 1577 by smichr: match doesn't put every wild as a key http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1577 Regarding the comment that the replacement dictionary (if present) should allow the pattern to rebuild the expression is exactly the problem with the return dictiona

Re: Issue 1827 in sympy: log eval gives more standard form

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Comment #1 on issue 1827 by asmeurer: log eval gives more standard form http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1827 I don't see the commit. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust you

Re: Issue 1824 in sympy: Pow(3, 1, evaluate=False) does not pretty-print correctly

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: NeedsReview Comment #2 on issue 1824 by asmeurer: Pow(3, 1, evaluate=False) does not pretty-print correctly http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1824 See http://github.com/asmeurer/sympy/tree/visual-factorint, first commit for a fix. -- You received thi

Re: Issue 1824 in sympy: Pow(3, 1, evaluate=False) does not pretty-print correctly

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Issue 1824: Pow(3, 1, evaluate=False) does not pretty-print correctly http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1824 This issue is now blocking issue 1828. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1828 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields

Issue 1828 in sympy: Visual factorint()

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: asmeurer Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview New issue 1828 by asmeurer: Visual factorint() http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1828 Add visual option to factorint() This lets you get a visual factorization of an integer, which is much easier to r

Re: Issue 1827 in sympy: log eval gives more standard form

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Comment #2 on issue 1827 by smichr: log eval gives more standard form http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1827 I didn't know that 1826 had disappeared so it is commit 1826 right now...I'll fix it. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of th

Re: Issue 1827 in sympy: log eval gives more standard form

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 1827 by asmeurer: log eval gives more standard form http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1827 Can you give an example of an expression that is easier to test with this? I am not sure about this, though it does seem like Maple does it: log(8);

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Comment #84 on issue 1598 by smichr: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 I'm new to the new object...is sympifying going to turn sqrt(2) automatically into an instance of AlgebraicNumber? There should be some property that can be quickly

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

2010-02-11 Thread sympy
Comment #85 on issue 1598 by smichr: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 I'm running into a problem with trying to do a substitution in a RootOf instance: eq = f(x).diff(x, 5) + 11*f(x).diff(x) - 2*f(x) ans = dsolve(eq, f(x)) ans f(x) ==