Comment #12 on issue 1798 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Refactoring Basic
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1798
This needs to rebased on current master.
Indeed. I'm working on it but it's not trivial. I'm bogged down in a mess
of merges.
--
You received this message because you
Comment #3 on issue 1875 by fabian.seoane: Pure literal resolution and unit
propagation should coexist in the same closure loop
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1875
Hi christian, great that you are working on this!
As asmeurer correctly pointed out, that page contains a lot
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1876 by zojdberg: SymbolsError: integrate(1/x+x,x)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1876
from __future__ import division
from numpy import *
from sympy import *
x = Symbol('x')
integrate(1/x+x,x)
--
You
Comment #1 on issue 1876 by asmeurer: SymbolsError: integrate(1/x+x,x)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1876
It works fine for me:
from __future__ import division
from numpy import *
from sympy import *
x = Symbol('x')
integrate(1/x+x,x)
log(x) + x**2/2
What versions of sympy
Updates:
Status: Started
Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch
Comment #6 on issue 1797 by Vinzent.Steinberg: fix isympy for upcoming
ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message
Updates:
Cc: mattpap
Comment #3 on issue 1843 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Increase coverage of ode.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1843
Mateusz pointed me during EuroSciPy 2009 to a certain line in the
integrator where
most of the time is spent and where performance could
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch
Comment #4 on issue 1843 by asmeurer: Increase coverage of ode.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1843
I'll do it for GSoC, if someone can point me in the right direction. ;) I
already have the Bronstein book, if that is
Comment #4 on issue 1875 by christian.muise: Pure literal resolution and
unit propagation should coexist in the same closure loop
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1875
I'll move the closure for unit-prop and pure-literal into a new
issue...patch for
this issue is listed
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview
Comment #13 on issue 1798 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Refactoring Basic
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1798
I've merged my branch with the latest master:
[http://github.com/rlamy/sympy/tree/Basic-split]. I hope the many merges
