Re: Issue 1879 in sympy: Satisfiable theory resulting in False

2010-04-04 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #11 on issue 1879 by christian.muise: Satisfiable theory resulting in False http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1879 Marking as fixed. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because yo

Re: Issue 1884 in sympy: local assumptions

2010-04-04 Thread sympy
Comment #5 on issue 1884 by Vinzent.Steinberg: local assumptions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884 The correct git url is git://github.com/vks/sympy.git local_assump sorry. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or b

Re: Issue 1884 in sympy: local assumptions

2010-04-04 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: NeedsReview Comment #6 on issue 1884 by Vinzent.Steinberg: local assumptions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884 I finally managed to implement as wanted (import inspect is the key), please review. The next step is to replace the old system used for al

Re: Issue 51 in sympy: RootOf for polynomial equations

2010-04-04 Thread sympy
Comment #8 on issue 51 by mattpap: RootOf for polynomial equations http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=51 I made some progress with RootOf implementation. A few examples follow: In [1]: f = cyclotomic_poly(20, x) In [2]: RootOf(f, 0) Out[2]: ⎛ 2468⎞ ζ₀⎝1 - x + x

Re: Issue 1884 in sympy: local assumptions

2010-04-04 Thread sympy
Comment #7 on issue 1884 by mattpap: local assumptions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884 need to improve the performance of ask() using caching for trivial queries That's one thing. First we need to improve ask() itself, e.g. by removing get_class() from it, using mro att

Re: Issue 966 in sympy: Can't simplify exp(2 * pi * I * a) when a is integer

2010-04-04 Thread sympy
Comment #62 on issue 966 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Can't simplify exp(2 * pi * I * a) when a is integer http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=966 Sorry for the late reply. I updated your branch for current master (see my github account) and still get the same failure: In [6]: _undet

Re: Issue 1884 in sympy: remove old assumptions

2010-04-04 Thread sympy
Updates: Summary: remove old assumptions Comment #8 on issue 1884 by Vinzent.Steinberg: remove old assumptions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of