Updates:
Cc: Ronan.Lamy
Comment #25 on issue 1778 by smichr: Rational from string can be improved
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1778
I suppose we could make Rational quite limited and strict, instantiating
from 1 or 2
integers/longs/Integers/Rationals: Rational(i,
Comment #26 on issue 1778 by fredrik.johansson: Rational from string can be
improved
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1778
That is not actually what the 'full' option in nsimplify does. The option
here should
probably be called 'exact' or something like that. Converting a
Comment #6 on issue 588 by smichr: simplify should be better at detecting
repeated factors
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=588
If you are just pulling out a visible term (not a hidden factor) then
consider using
terms_gcd:
terms_gcd(ans)
(-cos(x) + x**2*cos(x) +
Updates:
Cc: Vinzent.Steinberg asmeurer Ronan.Lamy
Comment #111 on issue 1598 by smichr: New polynomials manipulation module
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598
Where should we discuss polys8 ans polys related issues? I wanted to point
out that I
have an alternative
Comment #27 on issue 1778 by smichr: Rational from string can be improved
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1778
OK. In my original post I was going to suggest literal but exact can
work, too. I
checked to see that nsimplify would recognize that .[23] is 23/99 and saw
the full
Comment #3 on issue 1894 by mattpap: Xor(x, 1/y) doesn't work
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1894
how do you compute 1/True and 1/False?
In [1]: 1/True
Out[1]: 1.0
In [2]: 1/False
ZeroDivisionError: float division
I just expect this two inputs should give the same result:
Comment #4 on issue 1894 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Xor(x, 1/y) doesn't work
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1894
The same operator can have different meanings depending on the context.
In '1 2',
'' means bitwise-and, not boolean-and as in 'x y'. In contrast, 'And'
can only
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1717
Comment #15 on issue 1051 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: abs(sin(1)) raises
AssertionError
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1051
This was fixed in issue 1717.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the
Comment #13 on issue 1717 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: inconsistency between
facts
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1717
Issue 1051 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Labels: EasyToFix
Comment #6 on issue 216 by asmeurer: (-1)**Rational(1,3) could be
automatically rewritten using I
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=216
I think the only problem here is that im is not calling
expand(complex=True)
Status: Started
Owner: ronan.l...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Milestone-Release0.7.0 NeedsReview
New issue 1896 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Inner core refactoring
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1896
In my quest to clarify the structure of the core, I have been
Comment #5 on issue 1881 by notmyadd...@teewars.org: solve -
OverflowError: mpz too large for int
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1881
Ok, update from gmpy 1.02 to 1.11 fixed that exception, but no solution is
fund.
solve(f,lmbda)
[]
This is what I got in maple
12 matches
Mail list logo