Re: Issue 700 in sympy: pretty: merge test_pretty.py test_pretty_unicode.py

Updates: Status: Started Comment #3 on issue 700 by kazuo.thow: pretty: merge test_pretty.py test_pretty_unicode.py http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=700 I've started working on merging the two files; I'll post a patch by the end of Thursday (PDT). -- You received

Issue 1899 in sympy: factor(3 + x - x*(1 + x) + x**2) != 3

Status: Accepted Owner: smichr Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1899 by smichr: factor(3 + x - x*(1 + x) + x**2) != 3 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1899 factor(3 + x - x*(1 + x) + x**2), it seems, should reduce to 3. Instead (in polys8) it just returns the same

Issue 1900 in sympy: factor((1+2*x+x**2)**100) works too hard

Status: Accepted Owner: smichr Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1900 by smichr: factor((1+2*x+x**2)**100) works too hard http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1900 For the above expression, factor is working too hard (in polys8) to get the answer (1+x)**200. This should

Re: Issue 1899 in sympy: factor(3 + x - x*(1 + x) + x**2) != 3

Updates: Cc: mattpap Labels: Polynomial Comment #1 on issue 1899 by asmeurer: factor(3 + x - x*(1 + x) + x**2) != 3 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1899 Well, factor() *is* the opposite of expand(), which does this fine. So I guess the question is: Should