Re: Issue 1075 in sympy: there should be a way to evaluate sinh(1) to (-1/(2*E)+E/2)

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: PassedReview Comment #7 on issue 1075 by asmeurer: there should be a way to evaluate sinh(1) to (-1/(2*E)+E/2) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1075 I reviewed it and pushed it in. -- You received this message because you are subs

Re: Issue 1075 in sympy: there should be a way to evaluate sinh(1) to (-1/(2*E)+E/2)

Comment #6 on issue 1075 by jezr...@gmail.com: there should be a way to evaluate sinh(1) to (-1/(2*E)+E/2) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1075 rewrite has been fixed in this commit: http://github.com/int3/sympy/commit/ca384bf4108d5a7f2c7564128c5784f27680f010 -- You received

Re: Issue 1075 in sympy: there should be a way to evaluate sinh(1) to (-1/(2*E)+E/2)

Comment #5 on issue 1075 by asmeurer: there should be a way to evaluate sinh(1) to (-1/(2*E)+E/2) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1075 (Re on the patch posted on the patches list) I fixed some of these in issue 1448, but I guess I missed some. Looking through git grep -C 1

Re: Issue 1940 in sympy: Improvements for physical units

Comment #3 on issue 1940 by asmeurer: Improvements for physical units http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1940 I was just about to suggest using a dictionary instead of a tuple. {'length':0} should be just as easy to work with as Dimension(1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), but it will b

Re: Issue 1940 in sympy: Improvements for physical units

Comment #2 on issue 1940 by harold.erbin: Improvements for physical units http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1940 What do you think of using a dict for the dimension? I think it could be easy to continue to make dimensional analysis (we can imagine some functions or whatever to

Re: Issue 1941 in sympy: Objects that know how to combine themselves

Issue 1941: Objects that know how to combine themselves http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1941 This issue is now blocking issue 1336. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1336 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue

Re: Issue 1336 in sympy: Arbitrary constant type

Updates: Blockedon: 1941 Comment #11 on issue 1336 by asmeurer: Arbitrary constant type http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1336 The better core idea is now issue 1941. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To pos

Issue 1941 in sympy: Objects that know how to combine themselves

Status: Accepted Owner: asmeurer Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 1941 by asmeurer: Objects that know how to combine themselves http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1941 This is related to issue 1908. When I met with Ondrej last summer, we worked on a core where o

Re: Issue 1908 in sympy: more efficient core

Issue 1908: more efficient core http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908 This issue is now blocking issue 1941. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1941 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred

Re: Issue 1940 in sympy: Improvements for physical units

Updates: Status: Accepted Comment #1 on issue 1940 by asmeurer: Improvements for physical units http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1940 I am not so sure if I like using the tuples for the units. It does simplify the dimensional analysis, but it is not extensible. For exa

Issue 1940 in sympy: Improvements for physical units

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1940 by harold.erbin: Improvements for physical units http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1940 I improved the old Unit class in order to add some physical properties and comfort, like dimension, prefixes… It works

Re: Issue 1939 in sympy: Enhancements in ellipse class

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview Comment #1 on issue 1939 by asmeurer: Enhancements in ellipse class http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1939 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" gr

Issue 1939 in sympy: Enhancements in ellipse class

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1939 by harold.erbin: Enhancements in ellipse class http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1939 Some useful things were missing in the Ellipse class, such using the eccentricity instead of one of radius to create the

Re: Comment on TeXmacsInterface in sympy

Comment by timmy.horgan: x**2 For more information: http://code.google.com/p/sympy/wiki/TeXmacsInterface -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from t