Comment #5 on issue 1982 by smichr: use is None instead of == None
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1982
All the "== True" have been removed from expressions. This generated a
slight error in fcode which was fixed. It also highlighted a bit of a wart
in the printing logic: The
Comment #8 on issue 1985 by smichr: as_real_imag() gives wrong answer when
expanding quotient
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1985
In github/smichr branch t (the one up for review) you will get:
import sympy as S
S.var('x')
x
e = (x+x*S.I)/(1+S.I)
e.as_real_imag()
(re(x),
Updates:
Labels: -EasyToFix NeedsReview
Comment #5 on issue 1975 by smichr: nsimplify() should be recursive
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1975
Sorry about that...please see 1975 branch t at github/smichr
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
Comment #6 on issue 1975 by smichr: nsimplify() should be recursive
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1975
and commit 1778 for the sympification rational=True option.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to thi
Comment #9 on issue 1985 by renato.c...@gmail.com: as_real_imag() gives
wrong answer when expanding quotient
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1985
Yes, it works too. It's almost the same thing, using expand(c_mul=True). I
missed that in the docs, and was a bit surprised when
Comment #2 on issue 1972 by smichr: Doctests in a module docstring are not
executed
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1972
Nice catch. +1.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to sy
Updates:
Cc: Ronan.Lamy smichr Vinzent.Steinberg
Comment #10 on issue 1985 by asmeurer: as_real_imag() gives wrong answer
when expanding quotient
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1985
So I was so convinced that my solution (refactoring expand(complex=True)
and as_real
Comment #6 on issue 1978 by asmeurer: select whether constant gets
distributed into mul
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1978
I'm not sure about this one. Let's see what others think. (I'm
referencing the 1978 commit in your t branch).
--
You received this message because
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #7 on issue 1924 by asmeurer: Eq() gets .as_basic() method
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1924
I am +1 on the change given in 799dbcb17ac243a791c8 (see github comments).
I do think that maybe as_basic() should be rena
Comment #5 on issue 1926 by asmeurer: ode tweaks
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1926
See my comment on github. I am +1 on commit 0fcd2423eb1809a77330, except
that item 5c (4c in the commit message) should have a test, if I understand
it correctly.
--
You received this mes
Updates:
Labels: -PassedReview NeedsReview
Comment #8 on issue 1924 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Eq() gets .as_basic()
method
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1924
Still -1. An Eq is already an instance of Basic, so it doesn't make sense
to convert it to Basic - unless th
Comment #6 on issue 1647 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: leading_monom is incorrect
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1647
-1 on changing the name to something cryptic and non-compliant with PEP 8.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issue
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #10 on issue 1823 by asmeurer: integral.atoms(Symbol) should
introspect
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1823
See comments at github.
One thing though, shouldn't we make symbols an method of Basic that does
the same
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch
Comment #10 on issue 1772 by asmeurer: Integral(1,x).is_number fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1772
This doesn't work with the example I gave in comment 1:
In [2]: Integral(0, x).is_number
Out[2]: False
Also, I'm not
Updates:
Owner: asmeurer
Labels: Integration
Comment #12 on issue 334 by asmeurer: integrate: integrate(exp(-x**2), x)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=334
Of course, the right thing to do is to implement the full algorithm, which
can split out exp(-x**2) from th
Comment #9 on issue 1924 by smichr: Eq() gets .as_basic() method
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1924
Ronan, could you please give consideration to the difference between Basic
and basic just as we do for Integer and integer? Poly is also a Basic and
has this mechanism:
Po
Comment #7 on issue 1647 by smichr: leading_monom is incorrect
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1647
OTOH, anyone working with polynomials, I would think, would quickly take to
the short and concise names since they are derived from the first letter of
the relevant words. I di
Comment #10 on issue 1924 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Eq() gets .as_basic()
method
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1924
"integer" has a clear meaning, "basic" doesn't. Besides, all Integers are
integers, but integers aren't necessarily Integers: your suggestion is
inconsisten
Updates:
Labels: PassedReview
Comment #6 on issue 1982 by asmeurer: use is None instead of == None
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1982
I didn't see any "== True" fixes in t. Are they somewhere else. I am +1
on the commit 0509dc16d981a2aa784a in t (see comments on tha
Updates:
Labels: PassedReview
Comment #1 on issue 1983 by asmeurer: unify mul and pow handling of Add**e
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1983
See GitHub comments on commit f44e30877c6cc7911127.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #7 on issue 1978 by asmeurer: select whether constant gets
distributed into mul
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1978
Just to be absolutely rigorous (and to get into the habit), I am
referencing commit af3778790f8d21fe047b.
--
You received this message because you a
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview NeedsBetterPatch
Comment #6 on issue 1926 by asmeurer: ode tweaks
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1926
Adding PassedReview too because everything is fine except for the lack of
the test.
--
You received this message because y
22 matches
Mail list logo