Comment #132 on issue 1694 by smichr: solve has many issues with fractions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694
Sorry to be late in ringing in. I've had internet problem for the past two
days. I agree that log should not do anything wrt numer and denominator.
--
You received
Comment #2 on issue 2018 by smichr: terms vs factors
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2018
So do you want me to make a patch making this change?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to
Comment #4 on issue 2022 by smichr: inconsistent behaviour of subs when
using non-commutative symbols
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2022
no. I haven't looked at subs wrt NC.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
Comment #5 on issue 2022 by smichr: inconsistent behaviour of subs when
using non-commutative symbols
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2022
Although the ab-c should have worked (in some flavor of subs) I'm not sure
I would like the last one to work (In[3]) since that aaa is
Comment #14 on issue 1923 by nicolas.pourcelot: count_ops doesn't return a
count (by default)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1923
Sorry, I forgot to do git fetch.
Ok, I can see your last version now.
Here's my first comments:
1. Some minor comment first:
In
Comment #15 on issue 1923 by nicolas.pourcelot: count_ops doesn't return a
count (by default)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1923
I just realize that previous code will return 0 (and not S.Zero) if expr is
an empty list/set/tuple or dict, even if visual=True.
If this
Comment #1 on issue 2024 by asmeurer: Implement 'with' statement for
assumptions.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2024
The only problem is that with doesn't work in Python 2.4, so we will either
have to not use it in library code and test it using exec, or else drop
