Comment #10 on issue 2058 by asmeurer: atoms doesn't work correctly with
Indexed
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2058
I agree. I had no idea about IndexedElement. That works perfectly fine,
btw:
In [64]: i, j, n, m = symbols('i j n m', integer=True)
In [65]: M = Indexed
Comment #13 on issue 1793 by asmeurer: Integration failure
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1793
No. I am doing like you and putting all of my fixes in one branch. The
difference is that my branch also has an official issue associated with it,
issue 2010, so whenever I fix s
Comment #9 on issue 2058 by jensen.oyvind: atoms doesn't work correctly
with Indexed
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2058
Let me rephrase that:
It has to be way it is now, because it will be so incredibly cool to do
calculations using Indexed to represent abstract matrices,
Comment #8 on issue 2058 by jensen.oyvind: atoms doesn't work correctly
with Indexed
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2058
Comment 7 is accurate. However, for Function and FunctionClass the
difference is hidden to the user:
In [1]: f(x).atoms(f)
Out[1]: set(f(x))
In [2]:
Comment #13 on issue 1823 by smichr: integral.atoms(Symbol) should
introspect
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1823
Ronan, you split up Basic into Basic ans Expr...could you see if I've put
the routine and the tests in the right places (Basic and test_expr,
respectively)? P
Updates:
Cc: asmeurer
Comment #12 on issue 1793 by smichr: Integration failure
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1793
Aaron, this is marked as blocked on 2010...but if it's not a problem in
2010 should I just delete this issue?
--
You received this message because you a
