Issue 2094 in sympy: TypeError when trying to find a limit

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2094 by pevzi23: TypeError when trying to find a limit http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2094 I get the following error in master: limit((1-cos(3*x)+x**2)/(ln(1+2*x**3)+2*x**2), x, 0) . TypeError:

Re: Issue 2094 in sympy: TypeError when trying to find a limit

Comment #1 on issue 2094 by pevzi23: TypeError when trying to find a limit http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2094 By the way, the right answer is 11/4. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to this group, send

Re: Issue 2014 in sympy: sympy.solvers.solvers.solve should also allow frozenset to hold equations

Comment #9 on issue 2014 by torstenm...@googlemail.com: sympy.solvers.solvers.solve should also allow frozenset to hold equations http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2014 As no one disagreed, I prepare a combined patch for allowing all iterables and removing TypeError for the

Re: Issue 2009 in sympy: Document why solve((x-y,y),x) is None

Comment #15 on issue 2009 by torstenm...@googlemail.com: Document why solve((x-y,y),x) is None http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2009 Rebased patch to current origin master. Attachments: 2009.diff 1.1 KB 2009.test 23.7 KB -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 2014 in sympy: sympy.solvers.solvers.solve should also allow frozenset to hold equations

Comment #10 on issue 2014 by torstenm...@googlemail.com: sympy.solvers.solvers.solve should also allow frozenset to hold equations http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2014 ChangeLog: - Rebased patch to current origin master - Converted doctests to regular tesets - Removed raise

Re: Issue 2009 in sympy: Document why solve((x-y,y),x) is None

Comment #16 on issue 2009 by asmeurer: Document why solve((x-y,y),x) is None http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2009 What is silverstone? I think I understand what you are saying, and if so, I would prefer a dictionary ({variable:solution}). Here is the roots style: In [47]:

Re: Issue 2014 in sympy: sympy.solvers.solvers.solve should also allow frozenset to hold equations

Updates: Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview torstenmarcoknodt Comment #11 on issue 2014 by asmeurer: sympy.solvers.solvers.solve should also allow frozenset to hold equations http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2014 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You

Re: Issue 1620 in sympy: Allow derivatives of unknown functions evaluated at a point

Comment #7 on issue 1620 by asmeurer: Allow derivatives of unknown functions evaluated at a point http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1620 Thinking about this more, I think maybe we should use the same syntax as Maple, which is D(f)(0), or D[n](f)(0). See

Re: Issue 2009 in sympy: Document why solve((x-y,y),x) is None

Comment #17 on issue 2009 by torstenm...@googlemail.com: Document why solve((x-y,y),x) is None http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2009 Sorry, for the silverstone. It was a greeting from the T9 on my cell phone. An iterable for multiple variables would use the ordering given