Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #8 on issue 1729 by smichr: doctest failure on new master for
Windows 32 sys
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1729
The initial issue was solved with commit 02a106acea769.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
Updates:
Cc: asmeurer
Comment #18 on issue 2110 by smichr: failing tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2110
I only get this in 2.7, not in 2.6.4 (and I don't have 2.6.6). When I ran
doctests in 2.5 I got other failures as follows (and others of similar
complaint in
Comment #19 on issue 2110 by asmeurer: failing tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2110
Well, it's not too hard to see what's happening. You are running an
installed version of SymPy
(File "C:\python25\lib\site-packages\sympy\refine\__init__.py"). Check
your PYTHONPATH.
Updates:
Labels: smichr NeedsReview
Comment #20 on issue 2110 by smichr: failing tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2110
I think I wasn't in the sympy directory when I started the session. Now I
get:
h[1] >>> import sympy
h[1] >>> sympy.__version__
'0.6.7-git'
I s
Comment #3 on issue 1726 by Vinzent.Steinberg: XFAIL decorator does not
work with py.test
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1726
Please note that py.test is more useful for debugging than our own test
runner.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch
Comment #21 on issue 2110 by Vinzent.Steinberg: failing tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2110
I also tried this, it fixes the first failure but introduces new ones:
_ sympy/core/tests/test_subs.py:test_subs_
Comment #22 on issue 2110 by smichr: failing tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2110
OK, then I'll see about getting my non-commutative version into
mul.py...that will have to wait for a day or so.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
Comment #7 on issue 1587 by mattpap: Polynomials docs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1587
I had to improve/fix init_printing() (add wrap_line argument), runtests.py
(set encoding) and pretty printer (make it not ignore use_unicode in some
cases) to make all tests pass in pol
Comment #12 on issue 2059 by jensen.oyvind: Indexed should not wrap indices
in Idx
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2059
Since this affects the user interface, it would be very nice to get it in.
I am trying to see if I can fix it relatively easy. When is the deadline?
--
Comment #30 on issue 1337 by mattpap: find all instances in an expression
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1337
I went ahead and implemented preliminary version of replace(), e.g.:
In [1]: f = log(sin(x)) + tan(sin(x**2))
In [2]: a = Wild('a')
In [3]: f.replace(sin(a), cos(a))
Comment #4 on issue 1726 by asmeurer: XFAIL decorator does not work with
py.test
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1726
How so? I would rather spend energy backporting useful code from py.test
to our own test runner than trying to make our tests always work with a
third par
Comment #23 on issue 2110 by asmeurer: failing tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2110
Vinzent, you are going to have to take care of reviewing this one, since I
can't reproduce the error. Do you also not get the problem in 2.6?
--
You received this message because you ar
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment by asmeurer:
See the pull request.
Affected issues:
issue 1379: documentation tests fail when run in interactive mode
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1379
issue 1946: Recursion error with SYMPY_GROUND_TYPES=sympy
Status: Accepted
Owner: asmeurer
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium PassedReview Milestone-Release0.7.0
New issue 2145 by asmeurer: Update mpmath to 0.1This is j
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2145
This is just for bookkeeping so I don't forget to push this in.
See https://git
Comment #31 on issue 1337 by asmeurer: find all instances in an expression
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1337
It looks good. I would include an example of what map=True does in the
docstring.
Looking forward to replacing some of my risch_integrate() code with this.
--
You
Comment #5 on issue 1726 by Vinzent.Steinberg: XFAIL decorator does not
work with py.test
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1726
Yeah, but I think it is *much* easier to keep compability with py.test than
essentially rewriting it. Have you ever tried py.test for debugging?
-
Updates:
Summary: Update mpmath to 0.16
Comment #1 on issue 2145 by asmeurer: Update mpmath to 0.16
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2145
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues"
Comment #6 on issue 1726 by asmeurer: XFAIL decorator does not work with
py.test
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1726
No, I have never used py.test. What does it do?
And we wouldn't have to rewrite it; just copy the code over and modify it
to work with our stuff. This is
Comment #13 on issue 2059 by asmeurer: Indexed should not wrap indices in
Idx
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2059
Well, I can't do anything until Mateusz has polys12 ready to merge, but can
you aim for early next week? I start classes again on the 19th, so I want
to get
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #9 on issue 2018 by asmeurer: terms vs factors
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2018
See the pull request.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to thi
Comment #24 on issue 2110 by Vinzent.Steinberg: failing tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2110
Yeah, I guessed so. On 2.6.6 all tests pass.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email t
Status: Accepted
Owner: asmeurer
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2146 by asmeurer: Should SympifyError (and other errors) be
imported with "import *"?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2146
Right now SympifyError is not imported with "from sympy import *". Should
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #8 on issue 1587 by mattpap: Polynomials docs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1587
I fixed polys documentation, so now it compiles smoothly.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues"
Comment #6 on issue 1721 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Rename class 'Real'
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1721
This breaks backwards compatibility in a significant way so it couldn't
happen in a minor version release.
Making the change before merging polys12 could make the merge
Comment #20 on issue 1735 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Rename .func attribute
(.args too?)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1735
The point is that we don't want that invariant if we want to resolve issue
1688 (and issue 2006, etc.) There's basically no way to allow sin to behave
Comment #21 on issue 1735 by asmeurer: Rename .func attribute (.args too?)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1735
I see. I vote for .func then.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #7 on issue 1862 by asmeurer: f should be F
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1862
The commit at the pull request 42 is +1.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch
Comment #9 on issue 1587 by asmeurer: Polynomials docs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1587
The docs look good, but I get this problem in the Python 2.5 doctest runner:
== txt doctests start
==
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #3 on issue 2139 by asmeurer: _new_rawargs needs to watch for Atoms
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2139
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
Comment #7 on issue 1721 by asmeurer: Rename class 'Real'
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1721
Yes. I think if polys12 is rebased over a patch like this, then half of
the commits wouldn't work. So let's either avoid rebasing polys12 (just
use git merge), or wait to push you
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview asmeurer
Comment #12 on issue 1376 by asmeurer: sympy.sum overrides built-in sum
with a different call syntax
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1376
See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/78.
--
You received this message b
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview asmeurer
Comment #7 on issue 1727 by asmeurer: fix namespace clashes
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1727
See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/78.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues"
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1727
Comment #13 on issue 1376 by asmeurer: sympy.sum overrides built-in sum
with a different call syntax
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1376
Since we have decided to rename sum(), I am merging this into issue 1727.
--
Y
Updates:
Cc: Vinzent.Steinberg Ronan.Lamy
Comment #8 on issue 1727 by asmeurer: fix namespace clashes
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1727
Issue 1376 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-iss
Comment #13 on issue 2133 by asmeurer: Merge new polynomials manipulation
module
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2133
The benchmarks do not run in polys12:
__
entrypoint:
___
Comment #14 on issue 1376 by fredrik.johansson: sympy.sum overrides
built-in sum with a different call syntax
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1376
Maybe sums() or ssum()? It's short like sum_, without the ugly underscore,
and you can read it as "symbolic sum / sum symbolical
Comment #9 on issue 1727 by fredrik.johansson: fix namespace clashes
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1727
Maybe sums() or ssum()? It's short like sum_, without the ugly underscore,
and you can read it as "symbolic sum / sum symbolically" or "SymPy sum /
sum with SymPy".
--
37 matches
Mail list logo
