Re: Issue 2104 in sympy: canonical ordering of terms

2011-01-21 Thread sympy
Comment #5 on issue 2104 by justin.y...@gmail.com: canonical ordering of terms http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2104 I'm a newbie at SymPy, and I must be doing something wrong. When I try to run "python isympy.py -o lex" I get the message that isympy doesn't have an -o opt

Re: Issue 1947 in sympy: @property methods doctests do not give correct line numbers

2011-01-21 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -Priority-Critical Priority-Medium Comment #11 on issue 1947 by asmeurer: @property methods doctests do not give correct line numbers http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1947 This was pushed in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to t

Re: Issue 2104 in sympy: canonical ordering of terms

2011-01-21 Thread sympy
Comment #6 on issue 2104 by asmeurer: canonical ordering of terms http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2104 Yeah, I think it's only implemented in the git master so far (see GettingTheBleedingEdge). It should be in the next release, though. -- You received this message because yo

Issue 2158 in sympy: nsimplify rational should not call nsimplify again

2011-01-21 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: smi...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2158 by smi...@gmail.com: nsimplify rational should not call nsimplify again http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2158 nsimplify(log(3).n(), rational=True) returns an error because nsimplify is

Re: Issue 2158 in sympy: nsimplify rational should not call nsimplify again

2011-01-21 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: smichr NeedsReview Comment #1 on issue 2158 by smi...@gmail.com: nsimplify rational should not call nsimplify again http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2158 [ https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/92 ] -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: Issue 2085 in sympy: Limit code severely broken.

2011-01-21 Thread sympy
Comment #26 on issue 2085 by smi...@gmail.com: Limit code severely broken. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2085 the remaining 2085 issues is resolved in branch 2084 with commit titled "return quickly from series et al if there is no x" in pull/61 -- You received this message

Issue 2159 in sympy: int should round towards 0

2011-01-21 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: smi...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium smichr NeedsReview New issue 2159 by smi...@gmail.com: int should round towards 0 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2159 floor rounds down; int should round towards 0. This is now the behavior. -- You rec

Re: Issue 2159 in sympy: int should round towards 0

2011-01-21 Thread sympy
Comment #1 on issue 2159 by smi...@gmail.com: int should round towards 0 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2159 see [ https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/93 ] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To post to this group,