Comment #3 on issue by gitul...@gmail.com: Matrix([Matrix, ...])
should check the row length of empty matrices
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=
We should only allow Matrix*Matrix work if the number of columns
of the first one is equal to the number of rows in the sec
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview hector1618
Comment #11 on issue 2219 by asmeurer: Arbitrary constants in indefinite
integration
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2219
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G
Comment #2 on issue 2200 by pr...@goodok.ru: limit(sin(x),x,oo) should
raise an error
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2200
Just to keep it in one place I attach the correspondence about this theme
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy/browse_thread/thread/c834029d7696de5c?hl=e
Comment #4 on issue by asmeurer: Matrix([Matrix, ...]) should check
the row length of empty matrices
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=
I need to look more at my code in my integration3 branch that actually uses
Matrices with 0 dimensions so that I can understand this
Comment #5 on issue by pr...@goodok.ru: Matrix([Matrix, ...]) should
check the row length of empty matrices
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=
(I wonder whether such objects are allowed to exist at all
and it probably would be better to raise an exception in this place
Comment #6 on issue by pr...@goodok.ru: Matrix([Matrix, ...]) should
check the row length of empty matrices
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=
Just for to be clear:
Then push it in your current pull request (even if tests are broken)
`current` means respective of th
Comment #7 on issue by asmeurer: Matrix([Matrix, ...]) should check
the row length of empty matrices
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=
nx0 Matrices are used in my integration3 development branch (see
https://github.com/asmeurer/sympy/blob/integration3/sympy/integrals
Comment #8 on issue by pr...@goodok.ru: Matrix([Matrix, ...]) should
check the row length of empty matrices
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=
Aaron, I will consider your usage if 0xn matrix a little later, but I want
to ask some questions right now:
- are they used
Comment #4 on issue 671 by pr...@goodok.ru: implement Matrix.apply_map like
in Sage
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=671
I don't understand, what is wrong with this issue.
In interactive mode (isympy) I get this results:
>>> from __future__ import division
>>> from sy
Comment #9 on issue 508 by pr...@goodok.ru: exp(-0.5*x**2).series(x, 10)
fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=508
Most of tests are corrected (except x <> 0 cases which are not present in
this test work-flow anyway), and the remark similar to Ronan's one [1]
about what me
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 671 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: implement Matrix.apply_map
like in Sage
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=671
Yes, I think we're good. Let's close this.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #8 on issue 1462 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: NumberSymbol lacks
__int__ method
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1462
This is in now.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post
Comment #15 on issue 1473 by pr...@goodok.ru: __mod__ does not work on reals
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1473
It works:
>>> Real(2.3) % 2
0.300
>>> 2.3 % 2
0.3
>>> oo % 2
>>> nan
It is not but exception is right (in my opinion):
>>
Comment #20 on issue 794 by pr...@goodok.ru: .subs([(y,x**2), (x,2)])
substitutes in wrong order
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=794
I think that many of us get married since then.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/151
--
You received this message because you are subscribe
Comment #5 on issue 1931 by pr...@goodok.ru: diff(Eq(a, b), x) doesn't work
right
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1931
Well, I think that would be better if there the labels
like 'NeedDiscuss', 'NeedAgreement' would be in issue tracker. (or others
name-tokens with the same
Comment #16 on issue 1473 by pr...@goodok.ru: __mod__ does not work on reals
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1473
Sorry, for mis-printings, I want to say:
2.3 % x
2.3 % x
*or*
2.3 % x
2.3 mod x
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Labels: NeedsDecision
Comment #6 on issue 1931 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: diff(Eq(a, b), x) doesn't
work right
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1931
I added your second idea to the standard labels. Using it now...
--
You received this message because you are sub
Comment #7 on issue 1931 by pr...@goodok.ru: diff(Eq(a, b), x) doesn't work
right
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1931
Thanks, I will proceed tomorrow with the EasyToFix list.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
Comment #9 on issue by asmeurer: Matrix([Matrix, ...]) should check
the row length of empty matrices
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=
I'm don't know what [p:q] extracting is and I am not sure what you mean
by "construction of some convenient parts of data". Can you
Comment #10 on issue by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Matrix([Matrix, ...])
should check the row length of empty matrices
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=
I suppose Alexey means slicing, and indeed slicing with an empty slice
(e.g. M[2:2, :5]) should return an empty matrix
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2224 by mrock...@gmail.com: Number('5').__class__ == Real
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2224
Hi everyone,
First bug report and proposed solution. Be gentle y'all.
Currently the following is standard functio
Issue 1887: Separate boolean and symbolic relationals
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1887
This issue is now blocking issue 1931.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1931
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue,
Updates:
Blockedon: 1887
Comment #8 on issue 1931 by asmeurer: diff(Eq(a, b), x) doesn't work right
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1931
The NeedsDecision is a good idea. I will set it up so that it removes
EasyToFix, because I have seen quite a lot in the past few day
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #1 on issue 2224 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Number('5').__class__ ==
Real
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2224
I'm not sure that the Number constructor is actually useful to have. But as
long as we have it, its behaviour should certain
Updates:
Status: NeedsDecision
Labels: -NeedsDecision
Comment #9 on issue 1931 by asmeurer: diff(Eq(a, b), x) doesn't work right
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1931
Also, I think it makes more sense as a status rather than a label, since an
issue that is blocke
Updates:
Labels: -EasyToFix
Comment #10 on issue 1931 by asmeurer: diff(Eq(a, b), x) doesn't work right
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1931
So I don't think that removing labels is actually supported by the system,
only adding them. Suffice it to say that no NeedsDeci
Updates:
Status: NeedsDecision
Comment #2 on issue 950 by asmeurer: put all _sage_ methods to one place
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=950
What is the better way to do it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group
Comment #2 on issue 2224 by asmeurer: Number('5').__class__ == Real
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2224
Yeah, I thought we decided that sympify() should be the only function that
does str => SymPy handling.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl
Comment #3 on issue 950 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: put all _sage_ methods to
one place
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=950
I meant that the way it's done now is right. But I've changed my mind: this
should probably be done in the same way as for numpy or mpmath, in
lambdify(
Comment #4 on issue 950 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: put all _sage_ methods to
one place
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=950
Wait, no, that doesn't make sense. lambdify() creates functions, but here
we want to convert objects. So I don't know, actually.
We probably need some g
Comment #3 on issue 2224 by mrock...@gmail.com: Number('5').__class__ ==
Real
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2224
Ah, wasn't aware of sympify. It's quite handy. Should the Number
constructor simply call sympify then?
I'll defend having a Number constructor because sometim
Comment #1 on issue 2223 by sean.v@gmail.com: Rename top level
apply_operators to qapply
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2223
See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/152
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview sean.v.775
Comment #2 on issue 2223 by asmeurer: Rename top level apply_operators to
qapply
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2223
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl
33 matches
Mail list logo
