Issue 2278 in sympy: gruntz is broken

Status: Started Owner: ness...@googlemail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium ness987 New issue 2278 by ness...@googlemail.com: gruntz is broken http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2278 The current implementation of the gruntz algorithm is quite messed up and broken. To see thi

Re: Issue 719 in sympy: examples: convert output to pretty

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #8 on issue 719 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: examples: convert output to pretty http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=719 It's in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To post to this

Issue 2279 in sympy: Incorrect tests for ellipse

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2279 by sapta.ii...@gmail.com: Incorrect tests for ellipse http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2279 In test_geometry.py p2 = Point(1, 1) e2 = Ellipse(p2, half, 1) (line 191) e2.eccentricity is (3)**(1/2) which is

Re: Issue 2271 in sympy: integrate returns log(oo - I)

Comment #1 on issue 2271 by asmeurer: integrate returns log(oo - I) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2271 This has nothing to do with integrate, btw. If you don't call apart(), it works just fine (because it returns an atan). And I though integrate() called limit() when one o

Re: Issue 2271 in sympy: integrate returns log(oo - I)

Updates: Labels: Integration Comment #2 on issue 2271 by asmeurer: integrate returns log(oo - I) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2271 It seems I've contradicted myself. This *is* related to integrate(), but there is also a problem in limit() too. -- You received this

Re: Issue 2270 in sympy: Matrix(...) + scalar

Comment #11 on issue 2270 by asmeurer: Matrix(...) + scalar http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2270 For what it's worth, I agree with Ronan and Andy. I can see many bugs creeping in when we allow Matrices to be included in Expr expressions. -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 1822 in sympy: Remove Matrix.__getattr__

Updates: Status: Accepted Comment #16 on issue 1822 by asmeurer: Remove Matrix.__getattr__ http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1822 I don't think any decision needs to be made here. Let's remove Matrix.__getattr__. -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Issue 2280 in sympy: Expr returns itself when evaluated to a NaN

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2280 by sapta.ii...@gmail.com: Expr returns itself when evaluated to a NaN http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2280 In lines 174 - 186 in sympy/core/expr.py we see that expr returns itself when evaluated to a

Re: Issue 2280 in sympy: Expr returns itself when evaluated to a NaN

Comment #1 on issue 2280 by sapta.ii...@gmail.com: Expr returns itself when evaluated to a NaN http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2280 https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/225 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To p

Re: Issue 1822 in sympy: Remove Matrix.__getattr__

Comment #17 on issue 1822 by sherjilo...@gmail.com: Remove Matrix.__getattr__ http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1822 ... and add three functions for integrate, differentiate and limit ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues"