Comment #19 on issue 1916 by keith.ku...@gmail.com: Plotting fails: Window
initialization failed: Unable to share contexts
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1916
found the fix. 1) that os.environ call needs to occur before the import, at
least in both of my copies of win7. Nex
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: ---
Labels: -PassedReview NeedsReview saptman
Comment #30 on issue 652 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Write tests for acosh,
atanh, acoth
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=652
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You receiv
Comment #6 on issue 2293 by asmeurer: Unexpected limit behaviour
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2293
See issue 2300.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-issues@googlegroup
Status: Accepted
Owner: asmeurer
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium WrongResult EasyToFix
New issue 2300 by asmeurer: x.diff(4) doesn't fail
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2300
In [261]: x.diff(4)
Out[261]: x
In [262]: x.diff(2*x
.: )
---
Comment #5 on issue 2293 by asmeurer: Unexpected limit behaviour
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2293
Yeah, something similar to diff:
In [263]: x.diff(2*x)
---
ValueErrorTrac
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #11 on issue 2282 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: doctests broken by the
commit edabb89c5006a7
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2282
This is in, the doctest is fixed.
--
You received this message because
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #17 on issue 828 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: In sympy.geometry many
docstrings are not good enough
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=828
The branch is in. I think the geometry docstrings are very nice
Comment #29 on issue 652 by sapta.ii...@gmail.com: Write tests for acosh,
atanh, acoth
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=652
I have been working on this and most of the xfails have been moved to their
proper locations.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/231
The reason why
Status: Accepted
Owner: ronan.l...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High Assumptions Milestone-Release0.7.0
New issue 2299 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: compute_known_facts() is broken
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2299
In master:
In [1]: from sympy.assumptions.ask import comp
Comment #172 on issue 1694 by smi...@gmail.com: solve has many issues with
fractions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694
I'm just waiting for polys12 to get in place. So since nobody is reviewing
this and things might change with polys12 I've just closed it and will open
Updates:
Status: NeedsDecision
Cc: asmeurer ronan.l...@gmail.com andy.ter...@gmail.com
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Matrices
Comment #1 on issue 2298 by sherjilo...@gmail.com: Iterative methods to
solve Ax = B
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=229
Status: Accepted
Owner: sherjilo...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2298 by sherjilo...@gmail.com: Iterative methods to solve Ax = B
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2298
Sympy currently doesn't have iterative methods to solve Ax=B.
The methods are essentia
Comment #9 on issue 2283 by matt...@gmail.com: Non-iterative 'in'
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2283
find(cls) gives all subexpressions that are instances of `cls`, e.g.:
In [1]: var('A,B,C', commutative=False)
Out[1]: (A, B, C)
In [2]: f = x*gamma(x)*sin(x)*exp(x*y)*A*B*C*co
Comment #4 on issue 1418 by plaes...@gmail.com: integrate((x**Rational(1,2)
- x**3)/x**Rational(1,3), x) gives traceback
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1418
Added pull request at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/249 with some
other minor stuff...
--
You received this m
Comment #8 on issue 2283 by sherjilo...@gmail.com: Non-iterative 'in'
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2283
Related Issue : http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1337
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To
Comment #7 on issue 2283 by sherjilo...@gmail.com: Non-iterative 'in'
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2283
Looks great. Could you attach a link to the .find() code/commit/pull
request ?
Understanding the latter part of this .contains() is difficult without
knowing what .fin
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #6 on issue 2283 by matt...@gmail.com: Non-iterative 'in'
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2283
EPath won't help here, but the following code will:
from sympy.core import Add, Mul
def ncsplit(expr):
if expr.is_Add or expr.is_Mul:
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview sherjilozair
Comment #4 on issue 2293 by sherjilo...@gmail.com: Unexpected limit
behaviour
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2293
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/248
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G
Comment #3 on issue 2293 by sherjilo...@gmail.com: Unexpected limit
behaviour
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2293
Could someone suggest an error string ?
How about ValueError("Invalid limit variable %s" %z) ?
In [1]: limit(x**2, 4, 0)
--
Comment #2 on issue 2293 by sherjilo...@gmail.com: Unexpected limit
behaviour
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2293
Could someone suggest an error string ?
How about ValueError("Invalid limit variable %s" %z) ?
In [2]: limit(x**2, 4, 0)
---
Comment #15 on issue 754 by asmeurer: Have re and im call
expand(complex=True)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=754
re() and im() need to be rewritten to use as_real_imag() and/or
expand(complex=True) (however it works so that there are no infinite
recursion errors). Right
Comment #2 on issue 2244 by matt...@gmail.com: N(Matrix) does not work (but
Matrix.evalf() does)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2244
You can use @threaded decorator, thought it's not a very good solution.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Comment #1 on issue 2244 by asmeurer: N(Matrix) does not work (but
Matrix.evalf() does)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2244
Well it's not as easy as removing the sympify line, because we still want
sympifyable stuff to pass through (like ints).
I suppose the best solution
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #3 on issue 1418 by asmeurer: integrate((x**Rational(1,2) -
x**3)/x**Rational(1,3), x) gives traceback
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1418
A test should be added.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 1418 by plaes...@gmail.com: integrate((x**Rational(1,2)
- x**3)/x**Rational(1,3), x) gives traceback
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1418
This seems to be fixed in latest master \o/
In [2]: print integrate((x**Rational(1,2) -
25 matches
Mail list logo
