Comment #5 on issue 2302 by smi...@gmail.com:
2**Rational(4,5)*6**Rational(1,5) should auto-simplify to 2*3**Rational(1,5)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2302
What we have here is a case just opposite of power expanding which can take
a base or an exponent hint. We can
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2316 by smi...@gmail.com: limit involving multi-arg function
(polygamma and loggamma) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2316
h[2] polygamma(2,3)
polygamma(2, 3)
h[3] _.n()
Updates:
Summary: limit involving multi-arg function (polygamma) fails
Comment #1 on issue 2316 by smi...@gmail.com: limit involving multi-arg
function (polygamma) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2316
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2317 by smi...@gmail.com: loggamma needs testing
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2317
The current test suite is:
def test_loggamma():
pass
And things like loggamma(2,3) don't
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #19 on issue 1822 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Remove Matrix.__getattr__
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1822
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview
Comment #3 on issue 1754 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: ArgumentIndexError
referenced but never defined
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1754
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/264 - this is basically the same patch
as above.
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-Medium -EasyToFix Priority-Critical
Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #1 on issue 2318 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: doctest failed after
poly12 added
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2318
The problem is that polys12 switched the doctester for the Sphinx
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch
Comment #4 on issue 1754 by Vinzent.Steinberg: ArgumentIndexError
referenced but never defined
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1754
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #42 on issue 2133 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Merge new polynomials
manipulation module
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2133
It's been merged
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
Comment #2 on issue 2318 by pr...@goodok.ru: doctest failed after poly12
added
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2318
Well, I just now have created pull request [1] for solving doctest.
But I did not know that it was specially for Sphinx.
I suppose it is related with
Updates:
Cc: matt...@gmail.com
Comment #3 on issue 2318 by pr...@goodok.ru: doctest failed after poly12
added
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2318
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview
Comment #5 on issue 1754 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: ArgumentIndexError
referenced but never defined
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1754
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you
Comment #4 on issue 2318 by pr...@goodok.ru: doctest failed after poly12
added
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2318
@ Ronan
but if the patched version is used, other failures appear.
I don't understand something, what kind of failures appear in this case.
If it is
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #6 on issue 1754 by Vinzent.Steinberg: ArgumentIndexError
referenced but never defined
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1754
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message
Comment #4 on issue 2221 by asmeurer: hstack() and vstack() methods for
Matrix
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2221
If someone had done something with it, they would have posted here about it.
A patch being easy doesn't necessarily imply that anyone has done anything
with
Comment #13 on issue 537 by asmeurer: sympy - numpy interoperation
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=537
The issue tracker is still here on Google Code. It's only everything else
that has been moved (or is being moved, in the case of the wiki) to GitHub.
--
You received this
Status: Accepted
Owner: asmeurer
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 2319 by asmeurer: LaTeX input
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2319
So my friend pointed out to me that WolphramAlpha lets you enter any LaTeX
formula, and it will parse it and evaluate it. I
Comment #1 on issue 2319 by matt...@gmail.com: LaTeX input
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2319
There was a suggestion at SIAM CSE conference to add this feature.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this
Comment #5 on issue 2305 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Integer(3).sqrt() == 1
(Rename Integer.sqrt to Integer.isqrt)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2305
That's better, but I still think it should be a function, not a method.
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #6 on issue 2305 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Integer(3).sqrt() == 1
(Rename Integer.sqrt to Integer.isqrt)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2305
I agree that it should be rather a function. We don't have Integer.pow(0.5)
or similar.
--
You received this message because
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #5 on issue 2318 by pr...@goodok.ru: doctest failed after poly12
added
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2318
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #21 on issue 1117 by asmeurer: Setup buildbot (again)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1117
Would we really have to distribute the tests? I don't know a whole lot
about how cloud computing works, but we have 32 combinations of Python
versions, architectures, and
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #6 on issue 1741 by asmeurer: py.bench broken
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1741
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
Updates:
Cc: elliso...@gmail.com
Comment #7 on issue 1741 by asmeurer: py.bench broken
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1741
Is it possible to adapt IPython's timeit to do benchmarking?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #8 on issue 1741 by matt...@gmail.com: py.bench broken
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1741
See timeutils.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to
Comment #7 on issue 2203 by pr...@goodok.ru: doctest does not test IPython
interactive sessions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2203
Replacing In/Out with in the docs as far as possible produced at this
pull:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/266
Turned on:
Status: Accepted
Owner: ondrej.c...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2320 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: hydrogen doctest failures
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2320
I am getting hydrogen doctest failures on my machine:
_
Comment #1 on issue 2320 by pr...@goodok.ru: hydrogen doctest failures
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2320
I observed this failure only in the Windows platform (Python 2.7.1), but
didn't in linux for Python 2.4.4, 2.4.6, 2.5.5, 2.6.5, 2.6.6, 2.7.1.
Possible it is related
Comment #3 on issue 2315 by asmeurer: integrate(1/(x**2 + n**2, x) failure,
where n is an integer
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2315
Let's wait for Mateusz.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this
Comment #4 on issue 2315 by matt...@gmail.com: integrate(1/(x**2 + n**2, x)
failure, where n is an integer
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2315
This patch is wrong because it shouldn't happen that for a certain case
div() changes the domain of computation (ZZ - QQ). A sane
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #7 on issue 2315 by matt...@gmail.com: integrate(1/(x**2 + n**2, x)
failure, where n is an integer
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2315
Yes, to_field() will fix this problem (you can also use auto=True
in .div()). However, I would
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2321 by smi...@gmail.com: perfect power error
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2321
A number like 2**5*3**3 was coming back as being a perfect power with
exponent of 1, i.e. (2**5*3**3, 1). It
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #1 on issue 2321 by smi...@gmail.com: perfect power error
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2321
fix in https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/267
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #6 on issue 2302 by smi...@gmail.com:
2**Rational(4,5)*6**Rational(1,5) should auto-simplify to 2*3**Rational(1,5)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2302
part A of fix in https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/267
--
You
Comment #2 on issue 2320 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: hydrogen doctest failures
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2320
Quick bisection reveals:
1fc30f8c4f475d262077d5f5851d2137593073e3 is the first bad commit
commit 1fc30f8c4f475d262077d5f5851d2137593073e3
Author: Óscar Nájera
Comment #4 on issue 2320 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: hydrogen doctest failures
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2320
Here is the pull request when this got in:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/247
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #5 on issue 2320 by matt...@gmail.com: hydrogen doctest failures
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2320
This should be implemented in sympy/polys/orthopolys.py and only nicer API
should be implemented in sympy/functions.
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #7 on issue 2302 by smi...@gmail.com:
2**Rational(4,5)*6**Rational(1,5) should auto-simplify to 2*3**Rational(1,5)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2302
part B is there, too so
h[1] 2**Rational(4,5)*6**Rational(1,5)
2*3**(1/5)
--
You received this message
Comment #8 on issue 2302 by smi...@gmail.com:
2**Rational(4,5)*6**Rational(1,5) should auto-simplify to 2*3**Rational(1,5)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2302
Others might confirm:
h[1] solve(2*(3*x+4)**5 - 6*7**(3*x+9), x)
[-(4*log(7) +
Comment #6 on issue 2320 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: hydrogen doctest failures
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2320
Mateusz, should the laguerre_l() return expanded or unexpanded polynomials?
It makes better sense to me to return expanded polynomials.
In any case, I have fixed
40 matches
Mail list logo
