Updates:
Summary: Function to access the oeis database
Status: NeedsDecision
Cc: smi...@gmail.com
Comment #11 on issue 2303 by asmeurer: Function to access the oeis database
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2303
I think Chris pushed it in because he only re
Comment #10 on issue 2303 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: Remove
sympy.concrete.sequences.oeis
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2303
Yeah, I am also +1 to have this in sympy. Maybe it can go into utilities,
or somewhere, but surely this is very useful to play with integer sequences
Comment #9 on issue 2303 by matt...@gmail.com: Remove
sympy.concrete.sequences.oeis
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2303
commit c5f63f7932c2bfd2502a9faa8e96b8da6797e283
Merge: ed6fc02 b102d86
Author: Christopher Smith
Date: Wed Apr 27 23:40:43 2011 -0700
Merged pull re
Comment #9 on issue 2305 by gdrummo...@gmail.com: Integer(3).sqrt() == 1
(Rename Integer.sqrt to Integer.isqrt)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2305
These methods have been added by Mateusz as part of polys. Removing them
will break polys functionality.
Some commits I foun
Updates:
Labels: EasyToFix
Comment #10 on issue 1028 by smi...@gmail.com: Sum().doit() doesn't do it
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1028
The OP examples still aren't done and perhaps apart can be used to separate
the terms of expressions as given in [
http://code.goo
Comment #8 on issue 2303 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Remove
sympy.concrete.sequences.oeis
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2303
I don't know what's in Sage, but not everything they do is appropriate for
sympy. Anyway, it's completely unexpected for a library to suddenly fire up
Updates:
Labels: Assumptions WrongResult
Comment #1 on issue 2322 by asmeurer: is_real problems with (pi/log(real))
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2322
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #7 on issue 2303 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Remove
sympy.concrete.sequences.oeis
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2303
What's wrong with this, Ronan? I think it can be useful, and that it is
apparently in sage shows that similar projects came to the same conclusion.
--
Y
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #11 on issue 2315 by Vinzent.Steinberg: integrate(1/(x**2 + n**2,
x) failure, where n is an integer
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2315
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2323 by smi...@gmail.com: old is_zero assumption for log is broken
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2323
>>> log(x).is_zero
False
This should be None. It is returning whether the argume
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2322 by smi...@gmail.com: is_real problems with (pi/log(real))
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2322
Both the old and new assumption system have problems with this:
h[1] >>> var('r', real=T
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview
Comment #6 on issue 2288 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Triangle.inradius
incorrect
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2288
This is in.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issu
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #5 on issue 1418 by ronan.l...@gmail.com:
integrate((x**Rational(1,2) - x**3)/x**Rational(1,3), x) gives traceback
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1418
It's in.
--
You received this message becau
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 2303 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Remove
sympy.concrete.sequences.oeis
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2303
Well, this went in, a bit surprisingly, but I won't complain.
I'm closing this. Mateusz, feel free to open another issue
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview asmeurer
Comment #10 on issue 2315 by asmeurer: integrate(1/(x**2 + n**2, x)
failure, where n is an integer
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2315
See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/269.
--
You received this message because you are subs
Comment #9 on issue 2315 by asmeurer: integrate(1/(x**2 + n**2, x) failure,
where n is an integer
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2315
Patch (basically the one from comment 7) forthcoming…
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-is
Comment #12 on issue 829 by asmeurer: Improve simplify() to handle result
from integrate(log(k**2-m**2), k)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=829
If you consider that to be simple enough. If you want the simplest
solution, you will have to wait for integration3.
Also, maybe
Comment #8 on issue 2305 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Integer(3).sqrt() == 1
(Rename Integer.sqrt to Integer.isqrt)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2305
Yes, I think the methods gcd, lcm, gcdex, half_gcdex should also be
removed. They weren't there in 0.6.7, so there's no compat
Comment #7 on issue 2305 by asmeurer: Integer(3).sqrt() == 1 (Rename
Integer.sqrt to Integer.isqrt)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2305
Another inconsistency regarding methods to Integer:
In [9]: S(2).gcd
Out[9]:
In [10]: S(2).igcd
-
Comment #8 on issue 2315 by asmeurer: integrate(1/(x**2 + n**2, x) failure,
where n is an integer
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2315
auto doesn't seem to exist yet:
TypeError: div() got an unexpected keyword argument 'auto'
--
You received this message because you are subs
Comment #175 on issue 1694 by smi...@gmail.com: solve has many issues with
fractions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694
...and I'm working on the 1694 reconstruction.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #12 on issue 1276 by smi...@gmail.com: solve(-1 + x**2 +
0.111*(1.00 + 2.00*x)**2,x) fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1276
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message be
Comment #9 on issue 1095 by smi...@gmail.com: Trig functions break cancel
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1095
I've added a test and will put in a pull request later
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to th
Updates:
Summary: f (solve(e, k) hangs
Status: Fixed
Comment #8 on issue 1009 by smi...@gmail.com: f (solve(e, k) hangs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1009
chris>set SYMPY_USE_CACHE=no
h[1] >>> var("zz yy xx zy zx yx k")
(zz, yy, xx, zy, zx, yx, k)
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 1069 by smi...@gmail.com: 'together' should not expand
denominators
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1069
h[1] >>> together(1+1/(x+1)**2)
(1 + (1 + x)**2)/(1 + x)**2
h[2] >>> together(1+1/(x*(x+1)))
(1 + x*(1 +
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 989 by smi...@gmail.com: solve fails for intersection
of two circles
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=989
The solution is now obtained with results:
>>> count_ops(soln, visual=True)
4*NEG + 18*DIV + 62*SUB + 74*ADD + 1
Comment #11 on issue 829 by smi...@gmail.com: Improve simplify() to handle
result from integrate(log(k**2-m**2), k)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=829
Can this be closed?
h[7] >>> e = integrate(log(k**2-m**2), k)
h[8] >>> pprint (e)
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #11 on issue 783 by smi...@gmail.com: factor(y/pi + y*sin(x)/pi)
doesn't work
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=783
In test_polytools.py
f = x/pi + x*sin(x)/pi
g = y/(pi**2 + 2*pi + 1) + y*sin(x)/(pi**2 + 2*pi + 1)
assert fac
Comment #10 on issue 588 by smi...@gmail.com: simplify should be better at
detecting repeated factors
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=588
This now gives
h[3] >>> integrate(x**2 * exp(x) * cos(x), x)
exp(x)*sin(x)/2 + x**2*exp(x)*sin(x)/2 - x*exp(x)*sin(x) -
cos(x)*
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 573 by smi...@gmail.com: Composition of together() and
apart() should give identity
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=573
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #22 on issue 326 by smi...@gmail.com: sympy.roots_.sturm(...) hangs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=326
The example in comment 21 works in master now so I am marking this fixed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #174 on issue 1694 by Vinzent.Steinberg: solve has many issues with
fractions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694
polys12 was merged already.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, se
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-High
Comment #173 on issue 1694 by nicolas@gmail.com: solve has many issues
with fractions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694
Ok, waiting for polys12 then.
Seems like 1694 has become too big to be easily reviewed indeed
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #32 on issue 2011 by nicolas@gmail.com: less self-confident
simplify
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2011
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you ar
Comment #7 on issue 2320 by pr...@goodok.ru: hydrogen doctest failures
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2320
To clear for my self, I have a question why does `expand()`'s behavior
differs on windows and linux system? Or it is related with orthopoly?
Should the appropriate test
Comment #6 on issue 2312 by pr...@goodok.ru: Remove duplicated "block_diag"
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2312
Yes, there is a doctest warning.
I have inserted it specially for those reasons:
- if block_diag() function is planned to be deprecated then
warning.warn("", Depreca
36 matches
Mail list logo
