Issue 2347 in sympy: Basic sums not solved

Status: Accepted Owner: skr...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2347 by skr...@gmail.com: Basic sums not solved http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2347 The binomial theorem sum is not solved, nor the sum i*x**i This issue is related to 1028. The patch works

Issue 2349 in sympy: Match p**(s-x) for s!=x should return p=x

Status: Accepted Owner: skr...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2349 by skr...@gmail.com: Match p**(s-x) for s!=x should return p=x http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2349 (p**(s-x)).match(1) == {p:1} #for s=Wild('s', exclude=[x]) A first draft patch for

Issue 2350 in sympy: Sum(1/i, (i, 1, n)) should return harmonic(n)

Status: Accepted Owner: skr...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2350 by skr...@gmail.com: Sum(1/i, (i, 1, n)) should return harmonic(n) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2350 Self explanatory title -- You received this message because you are

Issue 2351 in sympy: Summation by parts

Status: Accepted Owner: skr...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2351 by skr...@gmail.com: Summation by parts http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2351 Implement summation by parts. In concrete mathematics there are good chapters explaining the analogies

Issue 2352 in sympy: Remove Ellipse.distance_to_center()

Status: NeedsDecision Owner: ronan.l...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview Geometry New issue 2352 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Remove Ellipse.distance_to_center() http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2352 Ellipse.distance_to_center() serves little purpose, is

Re: Issue 2352 in sympy: Remove Ellipse.distance_to_center()

Issue 2352: Remove Ellipse.distance_to_center() http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2352 This issue is now blocking issue 2346. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2346 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 2346 in sympy: Symbols should only be equal if they have the same assumptions

Updates: Blockedon: 2352 Comment #4 on issue 2346 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Symbols should only be equal if they have the same assumptions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2346 I split off the discussion about Ellipse.distance_to_center() to issue 2352. -- You received

Re: Issue 1117 in sympy: Setup buildbot (again)

Updates: Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.1 Comment #23 on issue 1117 by asmeurer: Setup buildbot (again) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1117 This is important, but I don't think it will happen before the next release. Anyway, it isn't really the sort of thing that

Issue 2353 in sympy: Warnings printed in the geometry tests

Status: Accepted Owner: asmeurer Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High Milestone-Release0.7.0 Geometry Testing New issue 2353 by asmeurer: Warnings printed in the geometry tests http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2353 From the tests: sympy/geometry/tests/test_geometry.py[12]

Issue 2354 in sympy: isympy -o doesn't parse bad arguments correctly

Status: Accepted Owner: asmeurer Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High Milestone-Release0.7.0 Printing New issue 2354 by asmeurer: isympy -o doesn't parse bad arguments correctly http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2354 $./bin/isympy -o notarealordering IPython console for SymPy

Re: Issue 1491 in sympy: Use nice ordering in printing

Updates: Blockedon: 2354 Comment #18 on issue 1491 by asmeurer: Use nice ordering in printing http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1491 I started looking at this, but it's unclear where the default should be set (there's bin/isympy, sympy/printing/printer.py, and

Re: Issue 2354 in sympy: isympy -o doesn't parse bad arguments correctly

Issue 2354: isympy -o doesn't parse bad arguments correctly http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2354 This issue is now blocking issue 1491. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1491 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Re: Issue 2354 in sympy: isympy -o doesn't parse bad arguments correctly

Comment #2 on issue 2354 by asmeurer: isympy -o doesn't parse bad arguments correctly http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2354 By the way, regarding the above error message, why is revlex not supported? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2354 in sympy: isympy -o doesn't parse bad arguments correctly

Updates: Cc: matt...@gmail.com Comment #3 on issue 2354 by asmeurer: isympy -o doesn't parse bad arguments correctly http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2354 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 1919 in sympy: unify behavior of var() and symbols()

Updates: Status: NeedsDecision Labels: -Milestone-Release0.7.0 -NeedsReview PassedReview Comment #22 on issue 1919 by asmeurer: unify behavior of var() and symbols() http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1919 The 'x y z' vs. 'x,y,z' is not important for the release,

Re: Issue 1919 in sympy: unify behavior of var() and symbols()

Updates: Labels: -PassedReview -smichr -mattpap Comment #23 on issue 1919 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: unify behavior of var() and symbols() http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1919 I don't think anybody is working on this now. -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 1491 in sympy: Use nice ordering in printing

Comment #20 on issue 1491 by matt...@gmail.com: Use nice ordering in printing http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1491 I'm at a conference right now and till tomorrow I may not have internet connection, so I will reply to this and other issues tomorrow. -- You received this

Re: Issue 1491 in sympy: Use nice ordering in printing

Comment #21 on issue 1491 by asmeurer: Use nice ordering in printing http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1491 OK, thanks. I am finally finished with classes, so I am going through all the release-0.7.0 issues and seeing what needs to be done. -- You received this message

Re: Issue 2348 in sympy: simplify gamma(x+1)/gamma(x)

Updates: Labels: Simplify Comment #1 on issue 2348 by asmeurer: simplify gamma(x+1)/gamma(x) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2348 I don't think it should necessarily happen automatically. Anyway, the only way to make that happen would be to modify Mul.flatten.

Re: Issue 2347 in sympy: Basic sums not solved

Comment #2 on issue 2347 by asmeurer: Basic sums not solved http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2347 Thanks. I see that the last time you contributed was before I ever joined the project. Welcome back! Creating a GitHub account and submitting patches as pull requests really is

Re: Issue 2350 in sympy: Sum(1/i, (i, 1, n)) should return harmonic(n)

Comment #1 on issue 2350 by asmeurer: Sum(1/i, (i, 1, n)) should return harmonic(n) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2350 It's better to include the text in the comment itself too, because of a Google Code bug where if you change the issue summary, the original one is lost

Re: Issue 2347 in sympy: Basic sums not solved

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview skreft Comment #1 on issue 2347 by asmeurer: Basic sums not solved http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2347 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues

Issue 2355 in sympy: Should we .gitignore .patch and .rej files?

Status: Accepted Owner: asmeurer Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2355 by asmeurer: Should we .gitignore .patch and .rej files? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2355 We currently .gitignore .patch and .rej files because of this commit: commit

Re: Issue 2203 in sympy: doctest does not test IPython interactive sessions

Updates: Labels: PassedReview Comment #8 on issue 2203 by asmeurer: doctest does not test IPython interactive sessions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2203 The pull request was merged, but not all In/Out doctests were fixed (see the previous comment). -- You