Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 2380 by smi...@gmail.com: as_independent is broken
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2380
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #11 on issue 2360 by smi...@gmail.com: Bug in geometry intersection
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2360
it's in so 2203 is no longer blocked.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" grou
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 2374 by smi...@gmail.com: the 'exact' keyword should be
removed from coeff
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2374
it's in
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To po
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #1 on issue 2380 by smi...@gmail.com: as_independent is broken
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2380
see https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/312
all branches of the code have been tested to be covered and all previous
and newl
Comment #5 on issue 2376 by asmeurer: should subs use strict=True when
sympifying?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2376
I agree.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-issu
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2380 by smi...@gmail.com: as_independent is broken
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2380
>>> (3*x).as_independent(Symbol)
(3*x, 1)
That should return (3, x).
--
You received this messa
Comment #4 on issue 2376 by smi...@gmail.com: should subs use strict=True
when sympifying?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2376
I don't think I can comment on that...I just think that allowing strings as
a target for subs is not a good idea.
--
You received this message becau
Comment #3 on issue 2376 by asmeurer: should subs use strict=True when
sympifying?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2376
I mean how in the new assumptions assumptions will no longer be tied to
Symbols.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr
Comment #2 on issue 2376 by smi...@gmail.com: should subs use strict=True
when sympifying?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2376
Do you mean the fact that two symbols are now different if their
assumptions are different?
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
Comment #1 on issue 2379 by asmeurer: sympy.utilities.decorator.wraps
should be compatible with functools.wraps
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2379
Do we have to keep it until after the release for 2.4 compatibility?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Comment #2 on issue 2378 by asmeurer: Remove Expr._op_priority and
@call_highest_priority
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2378
It looks like Brian was +1 on removing it, so let's do it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issue
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #27 on issue 1977 by asmeurer: symbols() gives unexpected behavior
when passed a list of length 1
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1977
Excellent! :-)
There was nothing more to do here, right?
--
You received this message because you are
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch
Comment #12 on issue 2307 by asmeurer: Duplicate methods: as_coeff_mul and
as_coeff_Mul
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2307
Chris has a better branch than mine. See the pull request.
--
You received this message because
Comment #7 on issue 1747 by asmeurer: nseries test failure with bin/test
--random
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1747
Yeah, that'd be great.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email
Updates:
Labels: Assumptions
Comment #1 on issue 2376 by asmeurer: should subs use strict=True when
sympifying?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2376
Let's also consider how the new assumptions factor into this.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
Updates:
Summary: Can't use @deprecated, @wraps in the core
Status: Started
Blockedon: -2135
Comment #4 on issue 1998 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Can't use @deprecated,
@wraps in the core
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1998
@deprecated and @wraps should b
Issue 2135: Drop support for Python 2.4
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2135
This issue is no longer blocking issue 1998.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1998
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or becaus
Status: Accepted
Owner: ronan.l...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Milestone-Release0.7.0
New issue 2379 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: sympy.utilities.decorator.wraps
should be compatible with functools.wraps
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2379
Having sympy.utilities
Updates:
Status: Started
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #1 on issue 2378 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Remove Expr._op_priority
and @call_highest_priority
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2378
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/311
--
You received this message because
Status: Accepted
Owner: ronan.l...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High Milestone-Release0.7.0
New issue 2378 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Remove Expr._op_priority and
@call_highest_priority
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2378
Cf.
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy/bro
Comment #26 on issue 1977 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: symbols() gives
unexpected behavior when passed a list of length 1
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1977
It turns out that I don't actually care enough about this to patch it
myself before the release, so I'm OK with breaking
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #2 on issue 1152 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Comparing Sum2 gives
wrong results
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1152
Sum2 has been removed, cf issue 2346.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"symp
Comment #6 on issue 1747 by plaes...@gmail.com: nseries test failure with
bin/test --random
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1747
I cannot reproduce this issue anymore. Shall I make a test and mark it as
fixed?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
23 matches
Mail list logo
