Re: Issue 2418 in sympy: Interval.evalf() returns a mpmath interval

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Comment #2 on issue 2418 by matt...@gmail.com: Interval.evalf() returns a mpmath interval http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2418 And remove interval_evalf() from sympy/solvers/inequalities.py. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2418 in sympy: Interval.evalf() returns a mpmath interval

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 2418 by asmeurer: Interval.evalf() returns a mpmath interval http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2418 Yeah, interval_evalf() should become Interval.evalf(). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To

Re: Issue 2406 in sympy: improve Tuple constructor

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Comment #11 on issue 2406 by renato.c...@gmail.com: improve Tuple constructor http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2406 I just sent a pull request: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/352 The fromiter() function just sympifies its args and pass on to Basic.__new__. As it is,

Re: Issue 2406 in sympy: improve Tuple constructor

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: NeedsReview Comment #12 on issue 2406 by renato.c...@gmail.com: improve Tuple constructor http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2406 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 1620 in sympy: Allow derivatives of unknown functions evaluated at a point

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Comment #23 on issue 1620 by renato.c...@gmail.com: Allow derivatives of unknown functions evaluated at a point http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1620 I implemented an Eval class (not sure about the name, though):

Re: Issue 2387 in sympy: Evalf of trig functions with imaginary arguments

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: ness987 NeedsReview Comment #5 on issue 2387 by ness...@googlemail.com: Evalf of trig functions with imaginary arguments http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2387 Pull request: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/354 -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 1620 in sympy: Allow derivatives of unknown functions evaluated at a point

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Comment #24 on issue 1620 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Allow derivatives of unknown functions evaluated at a point http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1620 Rather than Eval(f(x), x, x0), can't you use Eval(Lambda(x, f(x)), x0)? That way, you wouldn't have to duplicate the logic of

Issue 2420 in sympy: Refactor EPath

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: ronan.l...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High Milestone-Release0.7.0 Simplify New issue 2420 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Refactor EPath http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2420 This got in with several major issues unresolved: * Bad module name ('tools'

Issue 2421 in sympy: python(expr) issues

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: smi...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2421 by smi...@gmail.com: python(expr) issues http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2421 h[6] print python(Eq(a,b)) a = Symbol('a') b = Symbol('b') e = a == b But a == b is a bool

Re: Issue 1620 in sympy: Allow derivatives of unknown functions evaluated at a point

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Comment #25 on issue 1620 by renato.c...@gmail.com: Allow derivatives of unknown functions evaluated at a point http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1620 I thought about that, but decided not to do it because I wanted Eval to auto-expand whenever possible (I pushed this behavior

Re: Issue 1620 in sympy: Allow derivatives of unknown functions evaluated at a point

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Comment #26 on issue 1620 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Allow derivatives of unknown functions evaluated at a point http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1620 I see. It feels wrong not to use Lambda somehow, but we can deal with that later, once we get Eval to work (we might actually

Re: Issue 2411 in sympy: Revert _op_priority deletion

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Started Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-High Milestone-Release0.7.0 Comment #1 on issue 2411 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Revert _op_priority deletion http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2411 This needs to be resolved before the release, BTW. I'm

Re: Issue 2420 in sympy: Refactor EPath

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Started Labels: NeedsReview Comment #1 on issue 2420 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Refactor EPath http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2420 https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/356 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 1620 in sympy: Allow derivatives of unknown functions evaluated at a point

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Comment #27 on issue 1620 by asmeurer: Allow derivatives of unknown functions evaluated at a point http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1620 I would call it Subs, not Eval. And since it's an Uppercase unevaluated class, I think it shouldn't try to split out terms automatically.

Re: Issue 2411 in sympy: Revert _op_priority deletion

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Comment #2 on issue 2411 by asmeurer: Revert _op_priority deletion http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2411 Will that be ready soon, or should we just revert the reversion? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to

Re: Issue 2411 in sympy: Revert _op_priority deletion

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 2411 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Revert _op_priority deletion http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2411 Yes, it's ready soon. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to this group, send email to

Issue 2423 in sympy: Rotation.d function incorrect evaluation

2011-05-24 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: sean.v@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium WrongResult New issue 2423 by sean.v@gmail.com: Rotation.d function incorrect evaluation http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2423 from sympy.physics.quantum.spin import Rotation