Issue 2446 in sympy: as_dummy fails when symbol assumptions are set

Status: Accepted Owner: renato.c...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Assumptions EasyToFix New issue 2446 by renato.c...@gmail.com: as_dummy fails when symbol assumptions are set http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2446 x = Symbol('x', real=True) x.as_dummy()

Re: Issue 2440 in sympy: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables

Comment #4 on issue 2440 by renato.c...@gmail.com: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2440 I pushed a solution for this that works as described above (but does not convert internal symbols into dummies). It

Re: Issue 2440 in sympy: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables

Comment #5 on issue 2440 by renato.c...@gmail.com: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2440 Sorry, forgot to link the commit (in renatocoutinho/sympy/tree/2440):

Re: Issue 2446 in sympy: as_dummy fails when symbol assumptions are set

Updates: Labels: -EasyToFix Comment #1 on issue 2446 by renato.c...@gmail.com: as_dummy fails when symbol assumptions are set http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2446 Now I'm not so certain if this is easy to fix. One can not mess with self.assumptions0, but changing

Re: Issue 2207 in sympy: Can't pretty-print dicts or sets containing non-Expr objects

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview Comment #3 on issue 2207 by asmeurer: Can't pretty-print dicts or sets containing non-Expr objects http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2207 This was pushed. -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 2385 in sympy: Refactor Basic.sorted_key

Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview Comment #7 on issue 2385 by asmeurer: Refactor Basic.sorted_key http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2385 This was pushed. I guess this should stay open as an issue to keep open the old comparison system (?) Is this blocked on

Re: Issue 2385 in sympy: Refactor Basic.sorted_key

Updates: Labels: -Milestone-Release0.7.0 NeedsReview Comment #8 on issue 2385 by asmeurer: Refactor Basic.sorted_key http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2385 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 2385 in sympy: Refactor Basic.sorted_key

Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview Comment #9 on issue 2385 by asmeurer: Refactor Basic.sorted_key http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2385 Stupid label autocomplete... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to

Re: Issue 1374 in sympy: simplify(x**2-x**2.0) does not yield 0.

Comment #22 on issue 1374 by asmeurer: simplify(x**2-x**2.0) does not yield 0. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1374 Right now we have In [7]: 2.0 == 2 Out[7]: True In [8]: S(2.0) == S(2) Out[8]: True In [9]: x**2.0 == x**2 Out[9]: True In [14]: x**2.0 - x**2 Out[14]: 2

Re: Issue 2440 in sympy: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables

Comment #8 on issue 2440 by renato.c...@gmail.com: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2440 The question about ordering of limits in multiple integrals is in the same spirit of issue 1435 (d^2f/dxdy == d^2f/dydx):

Re: Issue 51 in sympy: RootOf for polynomial equations

Issue 51: RootOf for polynomial equations http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=51 This issue is now blocking issue 2304. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2304 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because

Re: Issue 2304 in sympy: Remove Pure from top-level namespace

Updates: Labels: -asmeurer mattpap Blockedon: 51 Comment #5 on issue 2304 by asmeurer: Remove Pure from top-level namespace http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2304 This has been superseded by the pull request from issue 51

Re: Issue 1374 in sympy: simplify(x**2-x**2.0) does not yield 0.

Comment #25 on issue 1374 by asmeurer: simplify(x**2-x**2.0) does not yield 0. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1374 Making floating point numbers automatically evaluate to exact numbers is a bad idea. We might as well not even have floating point numbers if we are going

Re: Issue 2440 in sympy: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables

Comment #9 on issue 2440 by asmeurer: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2440 @smichr: that's one of them. I was actually thinking about an extensive discussion on one of the pull requests with one of the

Re: Issue 2440 in sympy: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables

Comment #10 on issue 2440 by asmeurer: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2440 It was https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/204. Anyway, I don't think integration limits should be canonized automatically, nor

Re: Issue 2308 in sympy: Should we rename primitive()? (and Expr.primitive() should call primitive())

Updates: Labels: -Milestone-Release0.7.0 Comment #21 on issue 2308 by asmeurer: Should we rename primitive()? (and Expr.primitive() should call primitive()) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2308 If we aren't going to change the name, this shouldn't block the release